Damery Sarah, Wilson Sue, Draper Heather, Gratus Christine, Greenfield Sheila, Ives Jonathan, Parry Jayne, Petts Judith, Sorell Tom
Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2009 May 14;9:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-142.
If UK healthcare services are to respond effectively to pandemic influenza, levels of absenteeism amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) must be minimised. Current estimates of the likelihood that HCWs will continue to attend work during a pandemic are subject to scientific and predictive uncertainty, yet an informed evidence base is needed if contingency plans addressing the issues of HCW absenteeism are to be prepared.
This paper reports the findings of a self-completed survey of randomly selected HCWs across three purposively sampled healthcare trusts in the West Midlands. The survey aimed to identify the factors positively or negatively associated with willingness to work during an influenza pandemic, and to evaluate the acceptability of potential interventions or changes to working practice to promote the continued presence at work of those otherwise unwilling or unable to attend. 'Likelihood' and 'persuadability' scores were calculated for each respondent according to indications of whether or not they were likely to work under different circumstances. Binary logistic regression was used to compute bivariate and multivariate odds ratios to evaluate the association of demographic variables and other respondent characteristics with the self-described likelihood of reporting to work.
The survey response rate was 34.4% (n = 1032). Results suggest absenteeism may be as high as 85% at any point during a pandemic, with potential absence particularly concentrated amongst nursing and ancillary workers (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.5; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9 respectively).
Levels of absenteeism amongst HCWs may be considerably higher than official estimates, with potential absence concentrated amongst certain groups of employees. Although interventions designed to minimise absenteeism should target HCWs with a low stated likelihood of working, members of these groups may also be the least receptive to such interventions. Changes to working conditions which reduce barriers to the ability to work may not address barriers linked to willingness to work, and may fail to overcome HCWs' reluctance to work in the face of what may still be deemed unacceptable risk to self and/or family.
若英国医疗服务要有效应对大流行性流感,必须尽量减少医护人员的缺勤率。目前对于医护人员在大流行期间继续上班可能性的估计存在科学和预测方面的不确定性,但要制定应对医护人员缺勤问题的应急预案,就需要有可靠的证据基础。
本文报告了对西米德兰兹郡三个经目的抽样的医疗信托机构中随机抽取的医护人员进行的一项自行填写的调查结果。该调查旨在确定与流感大流行期间工作意愿呈正相关或负相关的因素,并评估潜在干预措施或工作方式改变对于促使原本不愿或无法上班的人员继续上班的可接受性。根据每位受访者在不同情况下是否可能上班的指示,计算出“可能性”和“可说服性”得分。采用二元逻辑回归计算双变量和多变量比值比,以评估人口统计学变量及其他受访者特征与自述上班可能性之间的关联。
调查回复率为34.4%(n = 1032)。结果表明,在大流行期间的任何时候,缺勤率可能高达85%,潜在缺勤情况尤其集中在护理人员和辅助人员中(比值比分别为0.3;95%置信区间0.1至0.7和0.5;95%置信区间0.2至0.9)。
医护人员的缺勤率可能大大高于官方估计,潜在缺勤集中在某些员工群体中。虽然旨在尽量减少缺勤率的干预措施应以自述上班可能性低的医护人员为目标,但这些群体的成员可能对这类干预措施的接受度也最低。改善工作条件以减少工作能力方面的障碍,可能无法解决与工作意愿相关的障碍,可能无法克服医护人员面对仍可能被视为对自身和/或家人不可接受的风险时不愿工作的问题。