Seale Holly, Leask Julie, Po Kieren, MacIntyre C Raina
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 13;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-30.
There is a general consensus that another influenza pandemic is inevitable. Although health care workers (HCWs) are essential to the health system response, there are few studies exploring HCW attitudes to pandemic influenza. The aim of this study was to explore HCWs knowledge, attitudes and intended behaviour towards pandemic influenza.
Cross-sectional investigation of a convenience sample of clinical and non-clinical HCWs from two tertiary-referral teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia was conducted between June 4 and October 19, 2007. The self-administered questionnaire was distributed to hospital personal from 40 different wards and departments. The main outcome measures were intentions regarding work attendance and quarantine, antiviral use and perceived preparation.
Respondents were categorized into four main groups by occupation: Nursing (47.5%), Medical (26.0%), Allied (15.3%) and Ancillary (11.2%). Our study found that most HCWs perceived pandemic influenza to be very serious (80.9%, n = 873) but less than half were able to correctly define it (43.9%, n = 473). Only 24.8% of respondents believed their department to be prepared for a pandemic, but nonetheless most were willing to work during a pandemic if a patient or colleague had influenza. The main determinants of variation in our study were occupational factors, demographics and health beliefs. Non-clinical staff were significantly most likely to be unsure of their intentions (OR 1.43, p < 0.001). Only 42.5% (n = 459) of respondents considered that neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medications (oseltamivir/zanamivir) would protect them against pandemic influenza, whereas 77.5% (n = 836) believed that vaccination would be of benefit.
We identified two issues that could undermine the best of pandemic plans - the first, a low level of confidence in antivirals as an effective measure; secondly, that non-clinical workers are an overlooked group whose lack of knowledge and awareness could undermine pandemic plans. Other issues included a high level of confidence in dietary measures to protect against influenza, and a belief among ancillary workers that antibiotics would be protective. All health care worker strategies should include non clinical and ancillary staff to ensure adequate business continuity for hospitals. HCW education, psychosocial support and staff communication could improve knowledge of appropriate pandemic interventions and confidence in antivirals.
人们普遍认为另一场流感大流行不可避免。尽管医护人员对卫生系统应对流感至关重要,但很少有研究探讨医护人员对大流行性流感的态度。本研究的目的是探讨医护人员对大流行性流感的知识、态度和预期行为。
2007年6月4日至10月19日,对澳大利亚悉尼两家三级转诊教学医院的临床和非临床医护人员便利样本进行横断面调查。自行填写的问卷分发给来自40个不同病房和科室的医院工作人员。主要结局指标是关于出勤和隔离、使用抗病毒药物以及感知准备情况的意向。
受访者按职业分为四个主要群体:护理人员(47.5%)、医疗人员(26.0%)、辅助人员(15.3%)和后勤人员(11.2%)。我们的研究发现,大多数医护人员认为大流行性流感非常严重(80.9%,n = 873),但不到一半的人能够正确定义它(43.9%,n = 473)。只有24.8%的受访者认为他们所在科室为大流行做好了准备,但尽管如此,如果有患者或同事感染流感,大多数人仍愿意在大流行期间工作。我们研究中差异的主要决定因素是职业因素、人口统计学和健康信念。非临床工作人员最有可能不确定自己的意向(比值比1.43,p < 0.001)。只有42.5%(n = 459)的受访者认为神经氨酸酶抑制剂抗病毒药物(奥司他韦/扎那米韦)能保护他们免受大流行性流感感染,而77.5%(n = 836)的人认为接种疫苗会有好处。
我们发现了两个可能破坏最佳大流行计划的问题——第一个问题是,作为一种有效措施,对抗病毒药物的信心水平较低;第二个问题是,非临床工作人员是一个被忽视的群体,他们缺乏知识和意识可能会破坏大流行计划。其他问题包括对预防流感的饮食措施信心较高,以及后勤人员认为抗生素会有保护作用。所有医护人员策略都应包括非临床和后勤人员,以确保医院有足够的业务连续性。医护人员教育、心理社会支持和人员沟通可以提高对适当大流行干预措施的认识以及对抗病毒药物的信心。