Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Jan;37(1):73-83. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp034. Epub 2009 May 14.
Neurocognitive dysfunction is milder in bipolar disorders than in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, supporting a dimensional approach to severe mental disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of lifetime history of psychosis for neurocognitive functioning across these disorders. We asked whether neurocognitive dysfunction in bipolar and schizophrenia spectrum disorders depends more on history of psychosis than diagnostic category or subtype.
A sample of individuals with schizophrenia (n=102), schizoaffective disorder (n=27), and bipolar disorder (I or II) with history of psychosis (n=75) and without history of psychosis (n=61) and healthy controls (n=280), from a large ongoing study on severe mental disorder, were included. Neurocognitive function was measured with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.
Compared with controls, all 3 groups with a history of psychosis performed poorer across neurocognitive measures, while the bipolar group without a history of psychosis was only impaired on a measure of processing speed. The groups with a history of psychosis did not differ from each other but performed poorer than the group without a history of psychosis on a number of neurocognitive measures. These neurocognitive group differences were of a magnitude expected to have clinical significance. In the bipolar sample, history of psychosis explained more of the neurocognitive variance than bipolar diagnostic subtype.
Our findings suggest that neurocognitive dysfunction in bipolar and schizophrenia spectrum disorders is determined more by history of psychosis than by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) diagnostic category or subtype, supporting a more dimensional approach in future diagnostic systems.
与精神分裂症谱系障碍相比,双相情感障碍的神经认知功能障碍较轻,这支持了严重精神障碍的维度方法。本研究旨在探讨精神病史对这些疾病中神经认知功能的作用。我们想知道双相情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系障碍的神经认知功能障碍是否更多地取决于精神病史,而不是诊断类别或亚型。
我们选取了一个来自正在进行的一项严重精神障碍的大型研究中的样本,其中包括有精神病史的精神分裂症患者(n=102)、分裂情感障碍患者(n=27)和双相情感障碍患者(I 或 II 型,有精神病史的 n=75,无精神病史的 n=61)和健康对照组(n=280)。使用全面的神经心理学测试组合来测量神经认知功能。
与对照组相比,所有有精神病史的 3 个组在神经认知测量中表现都较差,而没有精神病史的双相情感障碍组仅在处理速度测量中受损。有精神病史的组彼此之间没有差异,但在许多神经认知测量中表现不如没有精神病史的组。这些神经认知组间差异的大小预计具有临床意义。在双相情感障碍样本中,精神病史比双相情感障碍的诊断亚型能解释更多的神经认知差异。
我们的研究结果表明,双相情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系障碍的神经认知功能障碍更多地取决于精神病史,而不是精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第四版)的诊断类别或亚型,这支持了未来诊断系统采用更具维度性的方法。