Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Mar 30;196(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.021. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
This study sought to characterize the psychosis phenotype, contrasting cognitive features within traditional diagnosis and psychosis dimension in a family sample containing both schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar I disorder. Seventy-six probands with psychosis [44 probands with schizophrenia, 32 probands with psychotic bipolar I disorder] and 55 first-degree relatives [30 relatives of schizophrenia probands, 25 relatives of bipolar probands] were recruited. Standardized clinical and neuropsychological measures were administered. No differences in cognitive performance emerged between probands with schizophrenia and probands with psychotic bipolar disorder, or between relatives of probands with schizophrenia and relatives of probands with bipolar disorder in the domains of working and declarative memory, executive function and attention. Relatives overall showed higher cognitive performance compared to probands, as expected. However, when we segmented the probands and relatives along a psychosis dimension, independent of diagnostic groups, results revealed lower cognitive performance in probands compared to relatives without psychosis spectrum disorders, whereas relatives with psychosis spectrum disorders showed an intermediate level of performance across all cognitive domains. In this study, cognitive performance did not distinguish either probands or their first-degree relatives within traditional diagnostic groups (schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder), but distinguished probands and relatives with and without lifetime psychosis manifestations independent of diagnostic categories. These data support the notion that schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder present a clinical continuum with overlapping cognitive features defining the psychosis phenotype.
本研究旨在描述精神病表型,对比家族样本中传统诊断和精神病维度内的认知特征,该家族样本同时包含精神分裂症和伴有精神病性症状的双相 I 障碍患者。共招募了 76 名精神病患者(44 名精神分裂症患者,32 名伴有精神病性症状的双相 I 障碍患者)和 55 名一级亲属(30 名精神分裂症患者的亲属,25 名双相障碍患者的亲属)。对他们进行了标准化的临床和神经心理学评估。在工作记忆和陈述性记忆、执行功能和注意力等认知领域,精神分裂症患者与伴有精神病性症状的双相障碍患者之间、精神分裂症患者的亲属与双相障碍患者的亲属之间的认知表现没有差异。亲属的认知表现整体上优于患者,这是符合预期的。然而,当我们根据精神病维度将患者和亲属进行分段,而不考虑诊断组别时,结果显示,有精神病谱障碍的患者认知表现明显低于无精神病谱障碍的亲属,而有精神病谱障碍的亲属在所有认知领域的表现则处于中间水平。在这项研究中,认知表现既不能区分传统诊断组(精神分裂症和伴有精神病性症状的双相障碍)内的患者,也不能区分其一级亲属,但能独立于诊断类别,区分有和无终生精神病表现的患者和亲属。这些数据支持了以下观点,即精神分裂症和伴有精神病性症状的双相障碍呈现出一种临床连续体,具有定义精神病表型的重叠认知特征。