Suppr超能文献

双相I型障碍和双相II型障碍的神经认知特征:功能障碍模式和程度的差异

Neurocognitive profiles in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder: differences in pattern and magnitude of dysfunction.

作者信息

Simonsen Carmen, Sundet Kjetil, Vaskinn Anja, Birkenaes Astrid B, Engh John A, Hansen Charlotte Fredslund, Jónsdóttir Halldóra, Ringen Petter Andreas, Opjordsmoen Stein, Friis Svein, Andreassen Ole A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Ulleval University Hospital, and Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2008 Mar;10(2):245-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00492.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Studies on neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder, reporting deficits in memory, attention, and executive functioning, have primarily focused on bipolar I disorder. The aim of this study was to examine whether patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder have different neurocognitive profiles.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with bipolar I disorder, 31 patients with bipolar II and 124 healthy controls, from a large ongoing study on psychotic disorders, were included. Neurocognitive function was measured with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.

RESULTS

The bipolar I group performed significantly poorer than the healthy control group and the bipolar II group on all measures of memory. Compared with the control group, the bipolar I group also had significantly reduced performance on most measures of attention and executive functioning, while the bipolar II group only had a significantly reduced performance on a subset of these measures. On average, 24% of the bipolar I group had clinically significant cognitive impairment (< or =1.5 SD below the control group mean) across measures, compared with 13% of the bipolar II group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder in this study have different neurocognitive profiles. Bipolar I patients have more widespread cognitive dysfunction both in pattern and magnitude, and a higher proportion has clinically significant cognitive impairments compared with patients with bipolar II. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two bipolar subgroups.

摘要

目的

关于双相情感障碍神经认知功能的研究主要聚焦于双相I型障碍,这些研究报告了记忆、注意力和执行功能方面的缺陷。本研究的目的是检验双相I型障碍和双相II型障碍患者的神经认知特征是否不同。

方法

纳入了来自一项正在进行的关于精神障碍的大型研究中的42例双相I型障碍患者、31例双相II型障碍患者和124例健康对照者。使用一套全面的神经心理学测试组合来测量神经认知功能。

结果

在所有记忆测量指标上,双相I型障碍组的表现显著差于健康对照组和双相II型障碍组。与对照组相比,双相I型障碍组在大多数注意力和执行功能测量指标上的表现也显著降低,而双相II型障碍组仅在这些指标的一个子集中表现显著降低。平均而言,双相I型障碍组中有24%的患者在各项测量指标上存在临床上显著的认知障碍(低于对照组均值1.5个标准差或更低),而双相II型障碍组为13%。

结论

本研究中双相I型障碍和双相II型障碍患者具有不同的神经认知特征。双相I型障碍患者在模式和程度上存在更广泛的认知功能障碍,与双相II型障碍患者相比,有更高比例的患者存在临床上显著的认知障碍。这可能提示这两个双相情感障碍亚组之间存在神经生物学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验