Simonsen Carmen, Sundet Kjetil, Vaskinn Anja, Birkenaes Astrid B, Engh John A, Hansen Charlotte Fredslund, Jónsdóttir Halldóra, Ringen Petter Andreas, Opjordsmoen Stein, Friis Svein, Andreassen Ole A
Department of Psychiatry, Ulleval University Hospital, and Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bipolar Disord. 2008 Mar;10(2):245-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00492.x.
Studies on neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder, reporting deficits in memory, attention, and executive functioning, have primarily focused on bipolar I disorder. The aim of this study was to examine whether patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder have different neurocognitive profiles.
Forty-two patients with bipolar I disorder, 31 patients with bipolar II and 124 healthy controls, from a large ongoing study on psychotic disorders, were included. Neurocognitive function was measured with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.
The bipolar I group performed significantly poorer than the healthy control group and the bipolar II group on all measures of memory. Compared with the control group, the bipolar I group also had significantly reduced performance on most measures of attention and executive functioning, while the bipolar II group only had a significantly reduced performance on a subset of these measures. On average, 24% of the bipolar I group had clinically significant cognitive impairment (< or =1.5 SD below the control group mean) across measures, compared with 13% of the bipolar II group.
Patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder in this study have different neurocognitive profiles. Bipolar I patients have more widespread cognitive dysfunction both in pattern and magnitude, and a higher proportion has clinically significant cognitive impairments compared with patients with bipolar II. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two bipolar subgroups.
关于双相情感障碍神经认知功能的研究主要聚焦于双相I型障碍,这些研究报告了记忆、注意力和执行功能方面的缺陷。本研究的目的是检验双相I型障碍和双相II型障碍患者的神经认知特征是否不同。
纳入了来自一项正在进行的关于精神障碍的大型研究中的42例双相I型障碍患者、31例双相II型障碍患者和124例健康对照者。使用一套全面的神经心理学测试组合来测量神经认知功能。
在所有记忆测量指标上,双相I型障碍组的表现显著差于健康对照组和双相II型障碍组。与对照组相比,双相I型障碍组在大多数注意力和执行功能测量指标上的表现也显著降低,而双相II型障碍组仅在这些指标的一个子集中表现显著降低。平均而言,双相I型障碍组中有24%的患者在各项测量指标上存在临床上显著的认知障碍(低于对照组均值1.5个标准差或更低),而双相II型障碍组为13%。
本研究中双相I型障碍和双相II型障碍患者具有不同的神经认知特征。双相I型障碍患者在模式和程度上存在更广泛的认知功能障碍,与双相II型障碍患者相比,有更高比例的患者存在临床上显著的认知障碍。这可能提示这两个双相情感障碍亚组之间存在神经生物学差异。