• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋和/或膝早期骨关节炎患者的功能能力评估;需要进行两天的测试吗?

Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed?

机构信息

Research and Innovation Group in Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 3109, 9701 DC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Sep;19(3):238-44. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9179-y. Epub 2009 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-009-9179-y
PMID:19444597
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Work Well Functional Capacity Evaluation (WW FCE) is a two-day performance based test consisting of several work-related activities. Three lifting and carrying test items may be performed on both days. The objective of this study was to assess the need for repeated testing of these items in subjects with early osteoarthritis of the hip and/or the knee and to analyze sources of variation between the 2 days of measurement.

METHODS

A standardized WW FCE protocol was applied, including repeated testing of lifting low, lifting overhead and carrying. Differences and associations between the 2 days were calculated using paired samples t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA). Possible sources of individual variation between the 2 days were identified by Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for differences in performances between days and differences in possible sources of variation between days.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine subjects participated in this study, their mean (SD) age was 56.6 (4.8) years, median (min-max) WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) index scores for pain, stiffness and physical function were 5 (0-17), 3 (0-7) and 14 (0-49), respectively. Median (min-max) SF36 physical function was 75 (5-95), and SF36 pain score was 67 (12-76). Mean performance differences ranged from -0.2 to -0.8 kg (P > 0.05). ICC's ranged from 0.75 (lifting overhead) to 0.88 (lifting low). LoA were: lifting low 8.0 kg; lifting overhead 6.5 kg; carrying 9.0 kg. Pearson's correlations were low and non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

All three tests show acceptable two-day consistency. WW FCE testing on two consecutive days is not necessary for groups of subjects with early osteoarthritis. Individual sources of variation could not be identified.

摘要

简介

Work Well 功能能力评估(WW FCE)是一项为期两天的基于绩效的测试,包括多项与工作相关的活动。其中三个举重和搬运测试项目可在两天内进行。本研究的目的是评估在髋部和/或膝关节早期骨关节炎患者中重复测试这些项目的必要性,并分析测量 2 天之间的变异来源。

方法

应用标准化的 WW FCE 方案,包括对低举、高举和搬运进行重复测试。使用配对样本 t 检验、组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限(LoA)计算 2 天之间的差异和相关性。通过 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验确定 2 天之间个体变异的可能来源。计算了 2 天之间的性能差异以及 2 天之间可能的变异来源之间的差异的 Pearson 相关系数。

结果

共有 79 名受试者参加了这项研究,他们的平均(SD)年龄为 56.6(4.8)岁,中位数(最小-最大)WOMAC(安大略西部和麦克马斯特大学)疼痛、僵硬和身体功能指数分别为 5(0-17)、3(0-7)和 14(0-49)。SF36 身体功能的中位数(最小-最大)为 75(5-95),SF36 疼痛评分为 67(12-76)。平均性能差异范围为-0.2 至-0.8 公斤(P > 0.05)。ICC 范围为 0.75(高举)至 0.88(低举)。LoA 分别为:低举 8.0 公斤;高举 6.5 公斤;搬运 9.0 公斤。Pearson 相关系数较低且无统计学意义。

结论

所有三项测试均表现出良好的两天一致性。对于早期骨关节炎患者群体,不需要在连续两天进行 WW FCE 测试。个体变异的来源无法确定。

相似文献

1
Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed?髋和/或膝早期骨关节炎患者的功能能力评估;需要进行两天的测试吗?
J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Sep;19(3):238-44. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9179-y. Epub 2009 May 15.
2
Trajectories of Physical Work Capacity in Early Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of Hip and Knee: Results from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) Study.髋关节和膝关节队列研究(CHECK 研究):早期症状性髋膝关节骨关节炎患者体力活动能力的轨迹。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):483-492. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9809-3.
3
Self-reported functional status as predictor of observed functional capacity in subjects with early osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a diagnostic study in the CHECK cohort.自我报告的功能状态作为髋和膝关节早期骨关节炎患者观察到的功能能力的预测指标:CHECK 队列中的诊断研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Dec;19(4):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9189-9. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
4
Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.用于髋或膝骨关节炎患者的WOMAC问卷西班牙语版本的验证。西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数。
Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Nov;21(6):466-71. doi: 10.1007/s100670200117.
5
Validation of the Western Ontario and Mcmaster University osteoarthritis index in Asians with osteoarthritis in Singapore.新加坡骨关节炎亚洲患者中西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数的验证
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Jul;9(5):440-6. doi: 10.1053/joca.2000.0410.
6
Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation.为期两天的功能能力评估中提举和搬运的重测信度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Dec;12(4):269-75. doi: 10.1023/a:1020274624791.
7
Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)在意大利膝关节骨关节炎患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Aug;11(8):551-60. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00089-x.
8
Functional capacity of people with early osteoarthritis: a comparison between subjects from the cohort hip and cohort knee (CHECK) and healthy ageing workers.早期骨关节炎患者的功能能力:队列髋部和队列膝部(CHECK)受试者与健康老年工人的比较。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Dec;83(8):913-21. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0541-3. Epub 2010 May 21.
9
Measurement properties of the WOMAC LK 3.1 pain scale.WOMAC LK 3.1疼痛量表的测量属性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Mar;15(3):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
10
The factor subdimensions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) help to specify hip and knee osteoarthritis. a prospective evaluation and validation study.西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的因子亚维度有助于明确髋部和膝部骨关节炎。一项前瞻性评估与验证研究。
J Rheumatol. 2005 Jul;32(7):1324-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of Physical Work Capacity in Early Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of Hip and Knee: Results from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) Study.髋关节和膝关节队列研究(CHECK 研究):早期症状性髋膝关节骨关节炎患者体力活动能力的轨迹。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):483-492. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9809-3.
2
The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.WorkWell系统功能能力评估的可靠性:一项系统综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 27;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-106.
3
Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee): similarities and differences with the Osteoarthritis Initiative.CHECK(髋关节队列和膝关节队列):与骨关节炎倡议的异同
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Sep;68(9):1413-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.096164. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
2
Performance measures provide assessments of pain and function in people with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.性能指标可对髋部或膝部晚期骨关节炎患者的疼痛和功能进行评估。
Phys Ther. 2006 Nov;86(11):1489-96. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060002.
3
Direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoarthritis in active subjects.
颈背部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的可靠性和安全性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z.
4
Functional capacity of people with early osteoarthritis: a comparison between subjects from the cohort hip and cohort knee (CHECK) and healthy ageing workers.早期骨关节炎患者的功能能力:队列髋部和队列膝部(CHECK)受试者与健康老年工人的比较。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Dec;83(8):913-21. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0541-3. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
A short-form functional capacity evaluation predicts time to recovery but not sustained return-to-work.一份简短的功能能力评估可预测恢复时间,但不能预测持续返回工作岗位的情况。
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Sep;20(3):387-93. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9233-9.
活动期受试者骨关节炎的直接和间接成本。
J Rheumatol. 2006 Jun;33(6):1152-8.
4
Osteoarthritis: epidemiology.骨关节炎:流行病学
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Feb;20(1):3-25. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.09.007.
5
Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients.性能指标对于全面了解骨关节炎患者的情况很有必要。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;59(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
6
Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls.有症状的髋膝关节骨关节炎老年人的健康相关生活质量:与匹配的健康对照者的比较
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Aug;17(4):255-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03324607.
7
Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain.比较自我报告、临床检查和功能测试在评估慢性下腰痛患者工作相关限制方面的作用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 2;27(17):999-1005. doi: 10.1080/09638280500052823.
8
Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults.健康成年人中Isernhagen工作系统功能能力评估的重测信度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Dec;14(4):295-305. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000047431.40598.47.
9
Direct and indirect costs of osteoarthritis of the knee.膝关节骨关节炎的直接和间接成本
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004 Nov-Dec;22(6):699-706.
10
Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003 Oct;15(5):359-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03327356.