• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WorkWell系统功能能力评估的可靠性:一项系统综述。

The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.

作者信息

Bieniek Sebastian, Bethge Matthias

机构信息

Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 27;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-106.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-106
PMID:24674029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3974446/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional capacity evaluation (FCE) determines a person's ability to perform work-related tasks and is a major component of the rehabilitation process. The WorkWell Systems (WWS) FCE (formerly known as Isernhagen Work Systems FCE) is currently the most commonly used FCE tool in German rehabilitation centres. Our systematic review investigated the inter-rater, intra-rater and test-retest reliability of the WWS FCE.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search of studies on the reliability of the WWS FCE and extracted item-specific measures of inter-rater, intra-rater and test-retest reliability from the identified studies. Intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.75, percentages of agreement ≥ 80%, and kappa coefficients ≥ 0.60 were categorised as acceptable, otherwise they were considered non-acceptable. The extracted values were summarised for the five performance categories of the WWS FCE, and the results were classified as either consistent or inconsistent.

RESULTS

From 11 identified studies, 150 item-specific reliability measures were extracted. 89% of the extracted inter-rater reliability measures, all of the intra-rater reliability measures and 96% of the test-retest reliability measures of the weight handling and strength tests had an acceptable level of reliability, compared to only 67% of the test-retest reliability measures of the posture/mobility tests and 56% of the test-retest reliability measures of the locomotion tests. Both of the extracted test-retest reliability measures of the balance test were acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight handling and strength tests were found to have consistently acceptable reliability. Further research is needed to explore the reliability of the other tests as inconsistent findings or a lack of data prevented definitive conclusions.

摘要

背景

功能能力评估(FCE)可确定一个人执行与工作相关任务的能力,是康复过程的一个主要组成部分。WorkWell系统(WWS)FCE(以前称为伊瑟恩哈根工作系统FCE)目前是德国康复中心最常用的FCE工具。我们的系统评价调查了WWS FCE的评分者间、评分者内和重测信度。

方法

我们对有关WWS FCE信度的研究进行了系统的文献检索,并从已确定的研究中提取了评分者间、评分者内和重测信度的特定项目测量值。组内相关系数≥0.75、一致性百分比≥80%和kappa系数≥0.60被归类为可接受,否则被认为不可接受。对WWS FCE的五个性能类别提取的值进行了汇总,结果分为一致或不一致。

结果

从11项已确定的研究中,提取了150个特定项目的信度测量值。举重和力量测试的评分者间信度测量值中89%、所有评分者内信度测量值以及重测信度测量值的96%具有可接受的信度水平,相比之下,姿势/移动性测试的重测信度测量值中只有67%,运动测试的重测信度测量值中只有56%。平衡测试的两个提取的重测信度测量值均为可接受。

结论

发现举重和力量测试具有始终可接受的信度。由于结果不一致或缺乏数据,无法得出明确结论,因此需要进一步研究以探索其他测试的信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e713/3974446/7157a32ae16b/1471-2474-15-106-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e713/3974446/7157a32ae16b/1471-2474-15-106-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e713/3974446/7157a32ae16b/1471-2474-15-106-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.WorkWell系统功能能力评估的可靠性:一项系统综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 27;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-106.
2
Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review.成人重症监护的结局指标:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(24):1-111.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
7
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
8
Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Nov;77(8):527-37. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
9
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
10
Validity and Reliability of Field-Based Measures for Assessing Movement Skill Competency in Lifelong Physical Activities: A Systematic Review.评估终身体育活动中运动技能能力的现场测量方法的有效性和可靠性:一项系统综述
Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1443-54. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0357-0.

引用本文的文献

1
[Results of a Survey Regarding the Implementation of Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation for Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: Evaluation and Training of Work-Related Functional Capacity].[肌肉骨骼疾病患者工作相关医学康复实施情况的调查结果:工作相关功能能力的评估与培训]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024 Dec;63(6):367-375. doi: 10.1055/a-2388-5775. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation.患者报告的功能能力在功能能力评估后改善的可重复性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 16;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach.功能能力评估:运动物理方法的原理、程序和效用。
J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Sep;2(3):157-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01077187.
2
Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.临床医生评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者功能能力评估期间体力活动的可靠性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9470-9.
3
Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.
Do patient characteristics affect the predictive validity of Functional Capacity Evaluations?
患者特征是否会影响功能能力评估的预测效度?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 May;95(4):877-885. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01807-7. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Task-Contingent Persistence is Related to Better Performance-Based Measures in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.任务相关的持久性与慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的基于表现的更好的测量结果相关。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Jun 16;2020:1765456. doi: 10.1155/2020/1765456. eCollection 2020.
5
Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation in Cancer: A Cluster-Randomized Multicenter Study.工作相关医疗康复在癌症中的应用:一项集群随机多中心研究。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Sep 2;116(35-36):592-599. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0592.
6
Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before-After Study.功能能力评估对患者报告的功能能力的影响:一项探索性诊断前后研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(4):711-717. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09829-2.
7
Effectiveness of work-related medical rehabilitation in cancer patients: study protocol of a cluster-randomized multicenter trial.癌症患者工作相关医学康复的有效性:一项整群随机多中心试验的研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 27;16:544. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2563-z.
8
Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting.功能能力评估研究:第二届国际功能能力评估研究会议报告
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Mar;26(1):80-3. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9589-y.
颈背部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的可靠性和安全性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z.
4
Measuring reliability of effort in functional capacity evaluations using digital video analysis.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002 Jan 1;16(4):169-75. doi: 10.3233/bmr-2002-16408.
5
Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.在举重任务中视觉评估分类用力的准确性。
Work. 2011;40(4):445-57. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1256.
6
Work status and health-related quality of life following multimodal work hardening: a cluster randomised trial.多模式工作强化训练后的工作状态与健康相关生活质量:一项整群随机试验
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(3):161-72. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0290.
7
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist.系统评价研究测量特性的方法学质量评估:COSMIN 清单的评分系统。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
[A profile of requirements for the performance of work related medical rehabilitation from the perspective of the statutory pension insurance].[从法定养老保险角度看与工作相关的医学康复工作执行要求概况]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2011 Jun;50(3):160-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275721. Epub 2011 May 30.
9
[Success factors of work-related orthopaedic rehabilitation].[与工作相关的骨科康复的成功因素]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2011 Jun;50(3):145-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275687. Epub 2011 May 30.
10
Current state of vocationally oriented medical rehabilitation--a German perspective.职业导向的医学康复现状——德国视角。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2646-55. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.575528. Epub 2011 May 3.