Sakamoto Kiwako, Nakata Hiroki, Honda Yukiko, Kakigi Ryusuke
Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Neurosci Res. 2009 Jul;64(3):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
To clarify the effect of mastication on motor preparation processing using electroencephalography (EEG), we investigated the effect of mastication on contingent negative variation (CNV) and reaction time (RT) in Experiment 1, and movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in Experiment 2. The twelve subjects performed four CNV or MRCP sessions, and in the Mastication condition chewed a gum base during the resting period between sessions, Pre (before chewing) and Post 1, 2, and 3 (after chewing). In the Control condition, the subjects performed the same sessions without chewing gum during the intervals between sessions on another day. In Experiment 1, the mean amplitudes of the early- and late-CNV were significantly larger in Mastication than Control at Post 2 and Post 3. RT also differed significantly between Mastication and Control at Post 3. By contrast, in Experiment 2, there were no significant differences between Mastication and Control for the mean amplitudes of MRCPs including Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and negative slope (NS') in any session. These results suggest that mastication influences cognitive processing reflected by CNV with stimulus-triggered movement, rather than motor-related processing reflected by MRCPs relating to self-initiated movement, and provide evidence concerning the mechanisms for the effect of mastication on the human brain.
为了使用脑电图(EEG)阐明咀嚼对运动准备过程的影响,我们在实验1中研究了咀嚼对伴随负变化(CNV)和反应时间(RT)的影响,并在实验2中研究了咀嚼对运动相关皮层电位(MRCPs)的影响。12名受试者进行了4次CNV或MRCP实验,在咀嚼条件下,受试者在各实验之间的休息期(Pre,咀嚼前)以及咀嚼后的Post 1、Post 2和Post 3期间咀嚼口香糖基料。在对照条件下,受试者在另一天的实验间隔期间不咀嚼口香糖进行相同的实验。在实验1中,Post 2和Post 3时,咀嚼组早期和晚期CNV的平均幅度显著大于对照组。Post 3时,咀嚼组和对照组的RT也存在显著差异。相比之下,在实验2中,咀嚼组和对照组在任何实验中,包括运动准备电位(BP)和负斜率(NS')在内的MRCP平均幅度均无显著差异。这些结果表明,咀嚼影响由刺激触发运动的CNV所反映的认知过程,而非由与自发运动相关的MRCP所反映的运动相关过程,并为咀嚼对人脑影响的机制提供了证据。