Ponde Vrushali C, Diwan Sandeep
Department of Anesthesiology, All India institute of physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1967-70. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a2a252.
The classical response to nerve stimulation may be altered in cases of radial club hand. Ultrasound guidance may prove to be a useful tool in such situations. In this study, we compared the success rate of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation for children undergoing radial club hand repair.
Fifty children, aged 1-2 yr, undergoing radial club hand repair were randomly assigned to receive infraclavicular brachial plexus block guided by nerve stimulator (Group NS) or ultrasound (Group U) in combination with light general anesthetic. Bupivacaine 0.5 mL/kg of 0.5% was injected in both groups. Pain response to surgical stimulus was considered as block failure. The Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score was recorded at 1, 4, 6, 8, and 10 postoperative hours.
In Group NS, the blocks were successful in 16 of 25 patients (64%), whereas in Group U, 24 of 25 patients had successful blocks (P = 0.0053). There was no difference in the time to first analgesia or analgesic consumption in the 10-h study period.
Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block improves the success rate in patients with radial club hands when compared with nerve stimulation in patients undergoing radial club hand correction.
桡侧多指畸形病例中,对神经刺激的经典反应可能会改变。在这种情况下,超声引导可能是一种有用的工具。在本研究中,我们比较了超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞与神经刺激用于桡侧多指畸形修复儿童的成功率。
50例年龄1至2岁、接受桡侧多指畸形修复的儿童被随机分配接受神经刺激器引导下的锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞(NS组)或超声引导下的锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞(U组),并联合浅全身麻醉。两组均注射0.5%的布比卡因0.5 mL/kg。对手术刺激的疼痛反应被视为阻滞失败。记录术后1、4、6、8和10小时的安大略东部儿童医院疼痛量表疼痛评分。
NS组25例患者中有16例阻滞成功(64%),而U组25例患者中有24例阻滞成功(P = 0.0053)。在10小时的研究期间,首次镇痛时间或镇痛药物消耗量没有差异。
与神经刺激相比,超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞提高了桡侧多指畸形矫正患者的成功率。