Rebnord Ingrid Keilegavlen, Thue Geir, Hunskår Steinar
Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for legevaktmedisin, Kalfarveien 31, 5018 Bergen.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 May 14;129(10):987-90. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0288.
Availability of equipment for diagnostics and treatment in out-of-hours services in Norway is not documented and no guidelines exist on requirements for the various types of equipment (including drugs) needed. A knowledge basis on status and needs should be established so minimum requirements can be developed.
The National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care sent a questionnaire on availability of diagnostic equipment, laboratory tests, medication and quality assurance systems to all 261 municipal out-of-hours services in Norway in February 2006.
223/261 (86 %) of the services responded. 150 used the same office as a day-time practice, 59 had their own office and 14 were localised in a hospital/ emergency care unit. Services located in GP surgeries with a daytime-practice had a wider range of equipment, laboratory tests and medicines. Physicians on duty in the out-of-hours services with shared facilities did much of the laboratory work, but the quality control was done by the personnel at daytime. 27 % of the independent services did not have external control of their laboratory work (they were not members of the Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories). GPs were trained on acute medical situations more than once a year in 52 % of all the out-of-hours-services, but for only 40 % in the independent services. Other personnel were trained more than once a year in 74 % of the independent services.
Availability of equipment and laboratory test repertoire for GPs on duty at out-of-hours services seems to depend on whether the services are shared with GP surgeries and also used at daytime, and the distance to ambulance, hospital and pharmacy. Lack of routines for laboratory work and low training frequency in acute medical procedures may lead to poor quality of the analyses and lower competence than needed.
挪威非工作时间服务中诊断和治疗设备的可用性尚无记录,对于所需各类设备(包括药品)的要求也没有相关指南。应建立关于现状和需求的知识基础,以便制定最低要求。
2006年2月,国家紧急初级卫生保健中心向挪威所有261个市政非工作时间服务机构发送了一份关于诊断设备、实验室检测、药物及质量保证系统可用性的调查问卷。
223/261(86%)的服务机构做出了回应。150个机构与日间诊所共用一间办公室,59个有自己的办公室,14个位于医院/急救单元内。位于有日间诊所的全科医生诊所的服务机构拥有更广泛的设备、实验室检测项目和药品。在共用设施的非工作时间服务中值班的医生承担了大部分实验室工作,但质量控制由日间工作人员完成。27%的独立服务机构对其实验室工作没有外部监管(它们不是挪威初级保健实验室质量改进组织的成员)。在所有非工作时间服务中,52%的全科医生每年接受急性医疗情况培训不止一次,但在独立服务机构中这一比例仅为40%。在74%的独立服务机构中,其他人员每年接受培训不止一次。
非工作时间服务中值班全科医生的设备和实验室检测项目可用性似乎取决于这些服务是否与全科医生诊所共用且在日间也使用,以及与救护车、医院和药房的距离。实验室工作缺乏常规流程以及急性医疗程序培训频率低可能导致分析质量差和能力低于所需水平。