O'Dowd Thomas C, McNamara Kevin, Kelly Alan, O'Kelly Fergus
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital Dublin, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(1):15-8. doi: 10.1080/13814780600757195.
General practice co-operatives have led to significant improvements in quality of life for general practitioners. Little is known about general practitioners' own experiences with the working arrangements and governance of co-operatives. This study investigates GP satisfaction, the working environment, governance and future developments in co-operatives.
A questionnaire was sent to GPs in two co-operatives in the Republic of Ireland, covering mixed urban and rural areas.
Of 221 GPs in the co-operatives, 82% responded and confirmed the co-operatives' positive effects on their lives. However, 57% still received requests for out-of-hours care while off duty, most commonly from patients who preferred to see their own doctor. Half felt overburdened by out-of-hours work, especially those over 40 y of age. Twenty-five per cent were dissatisfied with the GP complaints mechanism. The majority (63%) would prefer a GP/health board partnership for the organization of out of hours, while 23% wanted sole responsibility. GPs indicated a strong need for better ancillary services such as nursing, mental health, dentistry, pharmacy and social work. Access to records is an important issue in terminal care and mental illness.
While GP co-operatives are a success story for general practice, they will work better for general practitioners and their patients if nursing, mental health, dentistry, pharmacy and social services are improved. Support and training is needed in mental health, palliative and emergency care to increase competence and reduce stress. GPs are willing to work with health authorities in further co-operative development. More attention needs to be paid to the complaints and suggestions of GPs in the running and governance of their co-operatives.
全科医疗合作社显著改善了全科医生的生活质量。对于全科医生自身在合作社工作安排和管理方面的经历,我们了解甚少。本研究调查了全科医生对合作社的满意度、工作环境、管理情况以及未来发展。
向爱尔兰共和国两个合作社的全科医生发放了问卷,涵盖城乡混合地区。
在合作社的221名全科医生中,82%作出回应并确认合作社对他们的生活产生了积极影响。然而,57%的人在下班后仍会接到非工作时间护理的请求,最常见的是来自希望看自己医生的患者。一半的人觉得非工作时间的工作负担过重,尤其是40岁以上的人。25%的人对全科医生投诉机制不满意。大多数人(63%)希望在非工作时间的安排上采用全科医生/健康委员会合作模式,而23%的人希望独自负责。全科医生表示强烈需要更好的辅助服务,如护理、心理健康、牙科、药房和社会工作。在临终关怀和精神疾病中,获取病历是一个重要问题。
虽然全科医疗合作社对全科医疗来说是一个成功案例,但如果护理、心理健康、牙科、药房和社会服务得到改善,它们将能更好地服务于全科医生及其患者。在心理健康、姑息治疗和急救护理方面需要支持和培训,以提高能力并减轻压力。全科医生愿意与卫生当局合作进行进一步的合作社发展。在合作社的运营和管理中,需要更多关注全科医生的投诉和建议。