Sourbron Steven, Ingrisch Michael, Siefert Axel, Reiser Maximilian, Herrmann Karin
Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul;62(1):205-17. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22005.
Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) is the current standard for the measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV), but it is not suitable for the measurement of Extraction Flow (EF) and may not allow for absolute quantification. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a methodology to measure CBF, CBV, and EF from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). A two-compartment modeling approach was developed, which applies both to tissues with an intact and with a broken Blood-Brain-Barrier (BBB). The approach was evaluated using measurements in normal grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) and in tumors of 15 patients. Accuracy and precision were estimated with simulations of normal brain tissue. All tumor and normal tissue curves were accurately fitted by the model. CBF (mL/100 mL/min) was 82 +/- 21 in GM and 23 +/- 14 in WM, CBV (mL/100 mL) was 2.6 +/- 0.8 in GM and 1.3 +/- 0.4 in WM. EF (mL/100 mL/min) was close to zero in GM (-0.009 +/- 0.05) and WM (-0.03 +/- 0.08). Simulations show an overlap between CBF values of WM and GM, which is eliminated when Contrast-to-Noise (CNR) is improved. The model provides a consistent description of tracer kinetics in all brain tissues, and an accurate assessment of perfusion and permeability in reference tissues. The measurement sequence requires optimization to improve CNR and the precision in the perfusion parameters. With this approach, DCE-MRI presents a promising alternative to DSC-MRI for quantitative bolus-tracking in the brain.
动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)是目前测量脑血流量(CBF)和脑血容量(CBV)的标准方法,但它不适用于测量脑血提取率(EF),且可能无法进行绝对定量。本研究的目的是开发并评估一种从T1加权动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)测量CBF、CBV和EF的方法。开发了一种双室建模方法,该方法适用于血脑屏障(BBB)完整和受损的组织。使用15例患者正常灰质(GM)、白质(WM)和肿瘤的测量数据对该方法进行了评估。通过对正常脑组织的模拟估计了准确性和精密度。所有肿瘤和正常组织曲线均能被该模型准确拟合。GM中的CBF(mL/100 mL/min)为82±21,WM中的为23±14;GM中的CBV(mL/100 mL)为2.6±0.8,WM中的为1.3±0.4。GM(-0.009±0.05)和WM(-0.03±0.08)中的EF(mL/100 mL/min)接近于零。模拟显示WM和GM的CBF值存在重叠,当对比噪声比(CNR)提高时这种重叠会消除。该模型对所有脑组织中的示踪剂动力学提供了一致的描述,并对参考组织中的灌注和通透性进行了准确评估。测量序列需要优化以提高CNR和灌注参数的精度。通过这种方法,DCE-MRI在脑定量团注追踪方面是DSC-MRI的一种有前景的替代方法。