Van Herpe Tom, De Moor Bart, Van den Berghe Greet
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-SCD), Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001 Heverlee (Leuven), Belgium
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Mar;23(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.07.003.
Blood glucose control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New algorithms, ranging from basic protocols to elementary computerized protocols to advanced computerized protocols, have been presented during the last years aiming to reduce the workload of the medical team. This paper gives an overview of the different types of algorithms and their features. Performance comparisons between different algorithms are avoided as blood glucose sampling frequencies and protocol durations were not similar among different studies and even within studies. Particularly advanced computerized protocols can potentially be introduced as fully-automated blood glucose algorithms when accurate and reliable near-continuous glucose sensor devices are available. Furthermore, it is surprising to consider in some of the described protocols that the original blood glucose target ranges (80-110 mg/dl) were increased (due to fear of hypoglycaemia) and/or that glycaemia levels were determined in capillary blood samples.
重症监护病房(ICU)护士进行血糖控制已成为危重症患者的标准治疗方法。在过去几年中,已经出现了从基本方案到初级计算机化方案再到高级计算机化方案等新算法,旨在减轻医疗团队的工作量。本文概述了不同类型的算法及其特点。由于不同研究之间甚至同一研究内部的血糖采样频率和方案持续时间不相似,因此未对不同算法进行性能比较。特别是当有准确可靠的近连续葡萄糖传感器设备时,先进的计算机化方案有可能作为全自动血糖算法引入。此外,令人惊讶的是,在一些所述方案中,最初的血糖目标范围(80 - 110mg/dl)因担心低血糖而提高,和/或血糖水平是通过毛细血管血样测定的。