Suppr超能文献

竞争效应对 α 频带内外稳态视觉诱发电位的影响。

Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the α band.

机构信息

Institut für Psychologie I, Universität Leipzig, Seeburgstrasse 14-20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(4):489-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2384-2. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

Abstract

Multiple concurrently presented stimuli are thought to compete for neuronal processing resources. Such competitive stimulus interactions can be investigated by "frequency tagging" each stimulus with an individual temporal frequency. In this case, all stimuli will drive distinct steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), hence allowing for an assessment of the distribution of processing resources. Here, we investigated whether competitive effects on SSVEP amplitudes are dependent upon the choice of tagging frequency of either the driving stimulus or a close-by competing stimulus. In particular, we were interested whether changes in amplitude are specific to a 10-Hz SSVEP, as it has been suggested that tagging frequencies within the alpha band drive uniquely characterized neural networks. If this was the case, an additional competition might be introduced when two stimuli are tagged with frequencies within the alpha band and thus compete for processing resources in similar networks. Additionally, we tested whether effects on SSVEP amplitude differ when the competing stimulus is tagged with a frequency of 12 Hz that produces a perceptible flicker when compared to an imperceptible 60-Hz flicker. We found a significant decrease in amplitude of 10- and 15-Hz SSVEPs upon presentation of the competing stimulus regardless of its tagging frequency. Our results clearly indicate that an SSVEP with a frequency within the alpha band and a 15-Hz SSVEP show similar sensitivity to effects of competition. Furthermore, the observed effects of competition on SSVEP amplitude occur independently of flicker perceptibility.

摘要

多种同时呈现的刺激被认为会争夺神经元处理资源。这种竞争刺激相互作用可以通过为每个刺激分配一个单独的时间频率来“频率标记”进行研究。在这种情况下,所有刺激都会产生不同的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),从而可以评估处理资源的分布。在这里,我们研究了竞争效应对 SSVEP 幅度的影响是否取决于驱动刺激或附近竞争刺激的标记频率的选择。特别是,我们感兴趣的是,振幅的变化是否特定于 10-Hz 的 SSVEP,因为有人认为,在 alpha 频带内的标记频率会驱动具有独特特征的神经网络。如果是这样,当两个刺激用 alpha 频带内的频率标记时,可能会引入额外的竞争,从而在相似的网络中争夺处理资源。此外,我们还测试了当竞争刺激用产生可感知闪烁的 12-Hz 频率而不是不可感知的 60-Hz 闪烁标记时,对 SSVEP 幅度的影响是否不同。无论竞争刺激的标记频率如何,我们都发现 10- 和 15-Hz SSVEP 的幅度明显降低。我们的结果清楚地表明,具有 alpha 频带内频率的 SSVEP 和 15-Hz SSVEP 对竞争效应具有相似的敏感性。此外,观察到的竞争对 SSVEP 幅度的影响独立于闪烁感知性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验