Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Epilepsia. 2010 Jan;51(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02099.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
Communicating the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is a challenging task. This study was carried out to assess the acceptability and effectiveness of a new communication procedure consisting of a patient information leaflet and a communication strategy for neurologists.
In a multicenter prospective study, 50 patients newly diagnosed with PNES were informed about the diagnosis by 10 different neurologists using the communication procedure. Follow-up data were gathered by telephone interview and completion of a questionnaire about symptom attributions (psychological/physical) and illness cognitions (Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised, IPQ-R).
Ninety-four percent of patients found the leaflet easy to understand. Ninety-four percent stated their questions were answered by the doctor; 70% got what they wanted from the consultation; only 4% reported feeling angry during the consultation. Eighty-six percent of patients acknowledged that psychological factors were at least contributing to their seizures. On the IPQ-R, "emotional" causes for the seizures were endorsed more commonly than "nonemotional" causes (p < 0.001). After 3 months, 14% of patients were seizure-free and 63% reported a >50% reduction in seizure frequency.
We conclude that our procedure is acceptable and effectively communicates a psychological etiologic model for PNES.
传达心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的诊断具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估一种新的沟通程序(包括患者信息传单和沟通策略)对神经科医生的可接受性和有效性。
在一项多中心前瞻性研究中,使用新的沟通程序,由 10 位不同的神经科医生向 50 位新诊断为 PNES 的患者告知诊断结果。通过电话访谈和完成有关症状归因(心理/身体)和疾病认知(修订后的疾病感知问卷,IPQ-R)的问卷来收集随访数据。
94%的患者认为传单易于理解。94%的患者表示他们的问题得到了医生的解答;70%的患者从咨询中获得了他们想要的信息;只有 4%的患者报告在咨询过程中感到愤怒。86%的患者承认心理因素至少对他们的发作有影响。在 IPQ-R 上,“情绪”原因比“非情绪”原因更常见(p<0.001)。3 个月后,14%的患者无发作,63%的患者报告发作频率减少>50%。
我们的结论是,我们的程序是可以接受的,并有效地传达了 PNES 的心理病因模型。