Bouchard Myriam, Amos Richard A, Briere Tina M, Beddar Sam, Crane Christopher H
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Aug;92(2):238-43. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 May 18.
The purpose was to determine the optimal radiation therapy modality (three-dimensional conformal photon-radiation therapy [3DCRT], intensity-modulated photon-radiation therapy [IMRT], or passive-scattering proton therapy [PT]) for safe dose escalation (72Gy) in pancreatic tumors in different positions relative to organs at risk (OAR) anatomy.
A 3-cm pancreatic tumor was virtually translated every 5mm over 5cm laterally. We generated two plans for each of the three techniques (3DCRT, IMRT, and PT), one that adhered to target coverage objectives and another to meet OAR sparing constraints with best coverage. We evaluated distances between gross tumor volumes and isodoses and compared dose-volume histograms.
IMRT was more conformal in higher gradient dose regions circumferentially, but tumor positions with anteriorly located small bowel benefited more from PT. 3DCRT plans resulted in inadequate target coverage. The V(15Gy) (mean+/-SD) were as follows for the IMRT and PT plans, respectively: stomach, 48%+/-4% vs 5%+/-3% (p<0.0001); and small bowel, 61%+/-8% vs 9%+/-4% (p<0.0001).
Our study showed that the optimal radiation therapy modality for safe dose escalation depends on pancreatic tumor position in relation to OAR anatomy.
确定针对不同位置的胰腺肿瘤(相对于危及器官[OAR]解剖结构)进行安全剂量递增(72Gy)的最佳放射治疗方式(三维适形光子放射治疗[3DCRT]、调强光子放射治疗[IMRT]或被动散射质子治疗[PT])。
将一个3厘米的胰腺肿瘤在横向上每隔5毫米虚拟平移5厘米。我们为三种技术(3DCRT、IMRT和PT)中的每一种生成了两个计划,一个计划符合靶区覆盖目标,另一个计划在实现最佳覆盖的同时满足OAR保护约束。我们评估了大体肿瘤体积与等剂量线之间的距离,并比较了剂量体积直方图。
IMRT在周向更高梯度剂量区域更适形,但小肠位于前方的肿瘤位置从PT中获益更多。3DCRT计划导致靶区覆盖不足。IMRT和PT计划的V(15Gy)(均值±标准差)分别如下:胃,48%±4%对5%±3%(p<0.0001);小肠,61%±8%对9%±4%(p<0.0001)。
我们的研究表明,安全剂量递增的最佳放射治疗方式取决于胰腺肿瘤相对于OAR解剖结构的位置。