Lee Eun Young, Lee Eun Bong, Park Byung Joo, Lee Chang Keun, Yoo Bin, Lim Mi Kyoung, Shim Seung-Cheol, Sheen Dong-Hyuk, Seo Young Il, Kim Hyun Ah, Baek Han Joo, Song Yeong Wook
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Chongno-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.019.
This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol 37.5-mg/acetaminophen 325-mg combination tablets (tramadoUAPAP) as add-on therapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain that was inadequately controlled by NSAIDs and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs alone.
Subjects in this multicenter, double-blind trial were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive 1 tramadol/ APAP tablet TID or a matching placebo for 1 week. Stable doses of previous medications were continued during the study. The primary efficacy variable was the mean daily pain relief score over 1 week, measured on a 6-point scale (4 = complete; ' = a lot; 2 = some; 1 = a little; 0 = none; -1 = worse). Secondary outcomes included the mean daily pain intensity score, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) (from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = extreme pain); pain intensity and pain relief at day 7; subjects' and investigators' mean overall assessments of study drug, measured on a Likert scale (from 2 = very good to -2 = very poor); and subjects' assessments of 8 aspects of physical function (measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire).
Of 277 subjects randomized to treatment, 267 (201 tramadol/APAP, 66 placebo) were included in the intent-to-treat population. Mean (SD) daily pain relief scores at the end of 1 week were significantly greater in the tramadol/APAP group compared with the placebo group (1.04 [0.89] vs 0.78 [0.80], respectively; P = 0.037), and mean daily pain intensity scores at the end of 1 week were significantly lower (47.23 [19.96] vs 53.81 [16.59]; P = 0.018). Physical function at the end of 1 week did not differ significantly between tramadol/APAP and placebo. Two hundred seventy-two subjects (205 tramadol/APAP, 67 placebo) were evaluable for tolerability. One hundred thirty-three of these subjects had at least 1 adverse event. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the tramadol/APAP group than in the placebo group (57.6% vs 22.4%; P < 0.001). Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 19.0% of the tramadol/APAP group and 3.0% of the placebo group (P = 0.001). Of 213 treatment-related adverse events in tramadol/APAP subjects, nausea (34.1%) was the most frequent, followed by dizziness (20.0%) and vomiting (15.6%). One serious adverse event--chest discomfort, nausea, and vomiting after taking study medication-occurred in a subject receiving tramadol/APAP The symptoms resolved 1 day after discontinuing tramadol/APAP.
In this study, tramadol/APAP used as add-on therapy in subjects with symptomatic RA was associated with a significant improvement in pain relief and a significant reduction in pain intensity compared with placebo, with no improvement in physical function. Use of tramadol/APAP may be considered when analgesics are needed in addition to conventional NSAIDs and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in subjects with RA.
本研究评估了曲马多37.5毫克/对乙酰氨基酚325毫克复方片剂(曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚)作为附加疗法,用于类风湿关节炎(RA)疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性,这些患者仅使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)时疼痛控制不佳。
在这项多中心、双盲试验中,受试者按3:1的比例随机分组,接受每日三次每次一片曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚或匹配的安慰剂,为期1周。研究期间继续使用之前稳定剂量的药物。主要疗效变量是1周内的平均每日疼痛缓解评分,采用6分制(4 = 完全缓解;3 = 缓解很多;2 = 缓解一些;1 = 缓解一点;0 = 无缓解;-1 = 疼痛加重)。次要结局包括平均每日疼痛强度评分,采用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量(从0毫米 = 无疼痛到100毫米 = 剧痛);第7天的疼痛强度和疼痛缓解情况;受试者和研究者对研究药物的平均总体评估,采用李克特量表测量(从2 = 非常好到-2 = 非常差);以及受试者对身体功能8个方面的评估(采用健康评估问卷测量)。
在随机接受治疗的277名受试者中,267名(201名曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组,66名安慰剂组)被纳入意向性治疗人群。与安慰剂组相比,曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组在1周结束时的平均(标准差)每日疼痛缓解评分显著更高(分别为1.04 [0.89] 与0.78 [0.80];P = 0.037),且1周结束时的平均每日疼痛强度评分显著更低(47.23 [19.96] 与53.81 [16.59];P = 0.018)。曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组和安慰剂组在1周结束时的身体功能无显著差异。272名受试者(205名曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组,67名安慰剂组)可评估耐受性。其中133名受试者至少有1次不良事件。曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组的不良事件发生率显著高于安慰剂组(57.6% 对22.4%;P < 0.001)。因不良事件停药的情况在曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组中占19.0%,在安慰剂组中占3.0%(P = 0.001)。在曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚组的213例与治疗相关的不良事件中,恶心(34.1%)最为常见,其次是头晕(20.0%)和呕吐(15.6%)。一名接受曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚治疗的受试者出现了1次严重不良事件——服用研究药物后出现胸部不适、恶心和呕吐。停用曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚1天后症状缓解。
在本研究中,曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚作为附加疗法用于有症状的RA患者,与安慰剂相比,疼痛缓解有显著改善,疼痛强度显著降低,但身体功能无改善。在RA患者中,除了传统的NSAIDs和DMARDs外还需要使用镇痛药时,可考虑使用曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚。