Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚的蚊帐拥有率和使用率有多公平?横向和纵向公平原则的实际应用。

How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity.

作者信息

Matovu Fred, Goodman Catherine, Wiseman Virginia, Mwengee William

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Management, Makerere University, PO Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Malar J. 2009 May 21;8:109. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-109.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies show that the burden of malaria remains huge particularly in low-income settings. Although effective malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have been promoted, relatively little is known about their equity dimension. Understanding variations in their use in low-income settings is important for scaling up malaria control programmes particularly ITNs. The objective of this paper is to measure the extent and causes of inequalities in the ownership and utilisation of bed nets across socioeconomic groups (SEGs) and age groups in Tanga District, north-eastern Tanzania.

METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to heads of 1,603 households from rural and urban areas. Households were categorized into SEGs using both an asset-based wealth index and education level of the household head. Concentration indices and regression-based measures of inequality were computed to analyse both vertical and horizontal inequalities in ownership and utilisation of bed nets. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to explore community perspectives on the causes of inequalities.

RESULTS

Use of ITNs remained appallingly low compared to the RBM target of 80% coverage. Inequalities in ownership of ITNs and all nets combined were significantly pro-rich and were much more pronounced in rural areas. FGDs revealed that lack of money was the key factor for not using ITNs followed by negative perceptions about the effect of insecticides on the health of users. Household SES, living within the urban areas and being under-five were positively associated with bed net ownership and/or utilisation.

CONCLUSION

The results highlight the need for mass distribution of ITN; a community-wide programme to treat all untreated nets and to promote the use of Long-Lasting Insecticidal nets (LLINs) or longer-lasting treatment of nets. The rural population and under-fives should be targeted through highly subsidized schemes and mass distribution of free nets. Public campaigns are also needed to encourage people to use treated nets and mitigate negative perceptions about insecticides.

摘要

背景

研究表明,疟疾负担仍然巨大,尤其是在低收入地区。尽管诸如经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)等有效的疟疾控制措施已得到推广,但对其公平性方面的了解相对较少。了解其在低收入地区的使用差异对于扩大疟疾控制项目,特别是ITN项目非常重要。本文的目的是衡量坦桑尼亚东北部坦噶区不同社会经济群体(SEG)和年龄组之间蚊帐所有权和使用方面不平等的程度及原因。

方法

对来自农村和城市地区的1603户家庭的户主进行了问卷调查。使用基于资产的财富指数和户主的教育水平将家庭分类为不同的社会经济群体。计算集中指数和基于回归的不平等度量,以分析蚊帐所有权和使用方面的纵向和横向不平等。焦点小组讨论(FGD)用于探讨社区对不平等原因的看法。

结果

与全球疟疾防治运动80%的覆盖率目标相比,ITN的使用率仍然低得惊人。ITN和所有蚊帐的所有权不平等显著有利于富人,且在农村地区更为明显。焦点小组讨论表明,缺钱是不使用ITN的关键因素,其次是对杀虫剂对使用者健康影响的负面看法。家庭社会经济地位、居住在城市地区以及年龄在五岁以下与蚊帐所有权和/或使用呈正相关。

结论

结果强调需要大规模分发ITN;开展一项社区范围的项目,对所有未处理的蚊帐进行处理,并推广使用长效杀虫剂蚊帐(LLIN)或对蚊帐进行更持久的处理。应通过高度补贴计划和免费蚊帐的大规模分发,将农村人口和五岁以下儿童作为目标群体。还需要开展公共宣传活动,鼓励人们使用经处理的蚊帐,并减轻对杀虫剂的负面看法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c313/2695473/64f6872eea9e/1475-2875-8-109-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验