Bernstein Peter, Thielemann Falk, Günther Klaus-Peter
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medical Faculty of the Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.
Open Orthop J. 2007 Dec 6;1:13-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325000701010013.
In residual hip dysplasia periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can improve insufficient coverage of the femoral head. It requires a broad dissection of the pelvic bones and detachment of muscle insertions, however. We have developed a modification of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy with reduced soft tissue exposure. It uses two small skin incisions and offers therefore the perspective of nicer scars but also increases the risk of technical complications due to impaired vision. To be able to draft these risks, the clinical and radiographic results of 23 patients with PAO through the modified Smith-Petersen approach of Ganz (group A) and 24 patients with our two-incision modification (group B) have been reviewed retrospectively with an average follow-up of 19 (group A) and 12 (group B) months postoperatively.Functional improvement (Harris Hip Score) and center-edge-angle normalization did not differ significantly in both groups. Scars of patients in group B were significantly shorter. However, the overall patient satisfaction (as measured with a visual analogous scale) was the same in both groups. 4 patients in group A and one patient in group B developed superficial or deep wound infections.In conclusion, the experience with our cohort study showed that approach-related morbidity can be reduced without increasing the risk for the individual patient. This observation clearly holds a promise for further minimal invasive approaches as well as for further morbidity reduction of PAO.
Retrospective comparative study (Level III).
在残留性髋关节发育不良中,髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)可改善股骨头覆盖不足的情况。然而,该手术需要广泛剥离骨盆骨并切断肌肉附着点。我们对伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术进行了改良,减少了软组织暴露。该改良术式采用两个小切口,因此有望形成更美观的瘢痕,但由于视野受限也增加了技术并发症的风险。为了评估这些风险,我们回顾性分析了23例采用改良甘茨史密斯-彼得森入路行PAO手术的患者(A组)和24例采用我们的双切口改良术式的患者(B组)的临床及影像学结果,术后平均随访时间分别为19个月(A组)和12个月(B组)。两组患者的功能改善情况(Harris髋关节评分)和中心边缘角正常化情况无显著差异。B组患者的瘢痕明显更短。然而,两组患者的总体满意度(采用视觉模拟量表测量)相同。A组有4例患者和B组有1例患者发生了浅表或深部伤口感染。总之,我们的队列研究经验表明,在不增加个体患者风险的情况下,可以降低手术相关的发病率。这一观察结果显然为进一步的微创方法以及降低PAO的发病率带来了希望。
回顾性比较研究(III级)。