• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项观察性研究表明,患有腰痛的人通常需要感觉“好多了”才会认为干预是值得的。

People with low back pain typically need to feel 'much better' to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study.

作者信息

Ferreira Manuela L, Ferreira Paulo H, Herbert Robert D, Latimer Jane

机构信息

Clinical & Rehabilitation Sciences Research Group, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):123-7. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70042-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70042-x
PMID:19463083
Abstract

QUESTIONS

How much of an effect do five common physiotherapy interventions need to have for patients with low back pain to perceive they are worth their cost, discomfort, risk, and incovenience? Are there any differences between the interventions? Do specific characteristics of people with low back pain predict the smallest important difference?

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

77 patients with non-specific low back pain who had not yet commenced physiotherapy intervention.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The smallest worthwhile effect was measured in terms of global perceived change (0 to 4) and percentage perceived change.

RESULTS

Participants perceived that intervention would have to make them 'much better', which corresponded to 1.7 (SD 0.7) on the 4-point scale, or improve their symptoms by 42% (SD 23), to make it worthwhile. There was little distinction made between interventions, regardless of whether smallest worthwhile effects were quantified as global perceived change (p = 0.09) or percentage perceived change (p = 1.00). Severity of symptoms independently (p = 0.01) predicted percentage perceived change explaining 9% of the variance, so that for each increase in severity of symptoms of 1 point out of 10 there was an increase of 4% in the percentage perceived change that participants considered would make intervention worthwhile.

CONCLUSIONS

Typically people with low back pain feel that physiotherapy intervention must reduce their symptoms by 42%, or make them feel 'much better' for intervention to be worthwhile.

摘要

问题

对于腰痛患者而言,五种常见的物理治疗干预措施需要产生多大效果,才能让他们觉得这些干预措施物有所值,值得承受其带来的不适、风险和不便?这些干预措施之间是否存在差异?腰痛患者的特定特征能否预测最小重要差异?

设计

横断面观察性研究。

参与者

77名尚未开始物理治疗干预的非特异性腰痛患者。

结局指标

最小有价值效果通过整体感知变化(0至4分)和感知变化百分比来衡量。

结果

参与者认为干预措施必须让他们“好多了”,在4分制量表上相当于1.7分(标准差0.7),或症状改善42%(标准差23%),才值得。无论最小有价值效果是以整体感知变化(p = 0.09)还是感知变化百分比(p = 1.00)来量化,干预措施之间几乎没有区别。症状严重程度独立地(p = 0.01)预测感知变化百分比,解释了9%的方差,因此,在10分制中症状严重程度每增加1分,参与者认为能使干预措施值得的感知变化百分比就增加4%。

结论

一般来说,腰痛患者觉得物理治疗干预必须将他们的症状减轻42%,或者让他们感觉“好多了”,干预才值得。

相似文献

1
People with low back pain typically need to feel 'much better' to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study.一项观察性研究表明,患有腰痛的人通常需要感觉“好多了”才会认为干预是值得的。
Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):123-7. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70042-x.
2
People with low back pain who have externalised beliefs need to see greater improvements in symptoms to consider exercises worthwhile: an observational study.一项观察性研究表明,具有外在信念的下背痛患者需要看到症状有更大改善才会认为锻炼是值得的。
Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(4):271-5. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70007-8.
3
The smallest worthwhile effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a benefit-harm trade-off study.非甾体抗炎药和物理疗法治疗慢性下腰痛的最小有意义效果:效益-危害权衡研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
4
A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain.对用于确定低腰背痛干预措施最小有价值效果的方法的批判性评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
5
The smallest worthwhile effect of primary care physiotherapy did not differ across musculoskeletal pain sites.初级保健物理治疗的最小有意义效果在肌肉骨骼疼痛部位之间没有差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 29.
6
The smallest worthwhile change on function from a self-management intervention for non-persistent low back pain.从非持续性腰痛的自我管理干预中获得的功能最小有意义变化。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3272-3279. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07633-4. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
7
Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.慢性下腰痛患者进行医学运动疗法、传统物理治疗和自我锻炼的疗效与成本。一项实用的随机单盲对照试验,随访1年。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 1;23(23):2616-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00017.
8
Effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care and physiotherapy compared with information and advice in the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.与信息及建议相比,脊椎按摩疗法和物理疗法在治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛中的有效性、成本及成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 22;18(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2351-3.
9
The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.公共与私人物理治疗低腰痛的随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182127457.
10
A biopsychosocial primary care intervention (Back on Track) versus primary care as usual in a subgroup of people with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.针对慢性下背痛亚组人群的生物心理社会初级保健干预(重回正轨)与常规初级保健的比较:一项随机对照试验方案
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):155. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving large-scale clinician adoption of AI-enabled decision support.实现人工智能支持的决策支持在临床医生中的大规模应用。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 May 30;31(1):e100971. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100971.
2
A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol.一项比较个体化物理治疗与冲击波治疗腘绳肌近端肌腱病的试点随机试验:方案
J Exp Orthop. 2023 May 25;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x.
3
Patients' perceived needs for allied health, and complementary and alternative medicines for low back pain: A systematic scoping review.
患者对低腰背痛的联合健康、补充和替代医学的需求:系统范围综述。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):824-847. doi: 10.1111/hex.12676. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
4
The importance of determining the clinical significance of research results in physical therapy clinical research.确定物理治疗临床研究中研究结果的临床意义的重要性。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):175-176. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
5
Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain.对患者至关重要的疼痛缓解:评估急性疼痛最小临床重要差异的实证研究的系统评价
BMC Med. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0775-3.
6
Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of isolated knee chondral lesions: design of a randomised controlled pilot study comparing arthroscopic microfracture versus arthroscopic microfracture combined with postoperative mesenchymal stem cell injections.脂肪来源间充质干细胞治疗孤立性膝关节软骨损伤:一项比较关节镜下微骨折与关节镜下微骨折联合术后间充质干细胞注射的随机对照试验性研究设计
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 18;5(12):e009332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009332.
7
Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change.日常临床实践中的个体患者监测:对最小重要变化的批判性评估。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):607-16. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0809-2. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
8
Specific treatment of problems of the spine (STOPS): design of a randomised controlled trial comparing specific physiotherapy versus advice for people with subacute low back disorders.脊柱问题的特定治疗(STOPS):一项比较特定物理治疗与亚急性下腰痛患者建议的随机对照试验设计。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 May 20;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-104.