Torstensen T A, Ljunggren A E, Meen H D, Odland E, Mowinckel P, Geijerstam S
Norwegian Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Bergen, Oslo, Norway.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 1;23(23):2616-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00017.
A multicenter, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.
To evaluate the efficiency of progressively graded medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise by walking in patients with chronic low back pain.
Varieties of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy are considered to reduce symptoms, improve function, and decrease sickness absence, but this opinion is controversial.
Patients with chronic low back pain or radicular pain sick-listed for more than 8 weeks and less than 52 weeks (Sickness Certificate II) were included. The treatment lasted 3 months (36 treatments). Pain intensity, functional ability, patient satisfaction, return to work, number of days on sick leave, and costs were recorded.
Of the 208 patients included in this study, 71 were randomly assigned to medical exercise therapy, 67 to conventional physiotherapy, and 70 to self-exercise. Thirty-three (15.8%) patients dropped out during the treatment period. No difference was observed between the medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy groups, but both were significantly better than self-exercise group. Patient satisfaction was highest for medical exercise therapy. Return to work rates were equal for all 3 intervention groups at assessment 15 months after therapy was started, with 123 patients were back to work. In terms of costs for days on sick leave, the medical exercise therapy group saved 906,732 Norwegian Kroner (NOK) ($122,531.00), and the conventional physiotherapy group saved NOK 1,882,560 ($254,200.00), compared with the self-exercise group.
The efficiency of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy is shown. Leaving patients with chronic low back pain untampered poses a risk of worsening the disability, resulting in longer periods of sick leave.
一项多中心、随机、单盲对照试验,随访1年。
评估渐进性分级医学运动疗法、传统物理治疗以及步行自我锻炼对慢性下腰痛患者的疗效。
多种医学运动疗法和传统物理治疗被认为可减轻症状、改善功能并减少病假,但这一观点存在争议。
纳入慢性下腰痛或根性疼痛且病假超过8周但少于52周(病假证明II)的患者。治疗持续3个月(36次治疗)。记录疼痛强度、功能能力、患者满意度、重返工作情况、病假天数及费用。
本研究纳入的208例患者中,71例被随机分配至医学运动疗法组,67例至传统物理治疗组,70例至自我锻炼组。33例(15.8%)患者在治疗期间退出。医学运动疗法组与传统物理治疗组之间未观察到差异,但二者均显著优于自我锻炼组。医学运动疗法的患者满意度最高。治疗开始后15个月评估时,所有3个干预组的重返工作率相同,有123例患者重返工作。在病假天数费用方面,与自我锻炼组相比,医学运动疗法组节省了906,732挪威克朗(NOK)(122,531.00美元),传统物理治疗组节省了1,882,560挪威克朗(254,200.00美元)。
显示了医学运动疗法和传统物理治疗的疗效。对慢性下腰痛患者不加干预有导致残疾恶化的风险,从而导致更长的病假时间。