• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不同类型的超声剪切刀产生的雾状颗粒和组织分离效率。

Evaluation of mist production and tissue dissection efficiency using different types of ultrasound shears.

机构信息

Research Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2822-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0512-5. Epub 2009 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0512-5
PMID:19466492
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound shears often are applied in minimally invasive surgery because they facilitate fast and secure tissue dissection, thereby reducing operative time. Although the technical principle underlying all the shears is almost identical, considerable differences exist between specific instruments. However, production of disturbing mist should be avoided.

METHODS

To obtain quantitative measurements regarding mist production, a novel hermetically sealed test system was developed. Tissue dissection efficiency was evaluated by means of a standardized cutting test. The dissection time and the numbers of cuttings were recorded. In this study, four different ultrasound dissectors from three manufacturers were assessed. One manufacturer provided two instruments: a conventional instrument and an improved version, which was designed particularly to reduce mist emission.

RESULTS

The fastest ultrasound dissector emitted the highest quantity of disturbing mist. However, improved dissection efficiency does not linearly correlate with mist production. This clearly could be shown for the improved "less mist production instrument," which turned out to work faster than the comparable standard dissector but produced significantly less mist.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonic shears are effective for bloodless tissue dissection but may impede surgical proceeding by mist production. The findings of this study demonstrate that emission of mist can be reduced not only by lowering the dissection power, resulting in a prolonged dissection time, but also by modifying the technical design of an instrument. Further development of ultrasonic cutting devices therefore should account for the desired results.

摘要

背景

超声剪切器常用于微创手术,因为它们可以快速、安全地进行组织切割,从而缩短手术时间。尽管所有剪切器的技术原理几乎相同,但特定仪器之间存在很大差异。然而,应避免产生干扰性的雾气。

方法

为了获得关于雾气产生的定量测量,开发了一种新颖的密封测试系统。通过标准化切割测试评估组织切割效率。记录切割时间和切割次数。在这项研究中,评估了来自三个制造商的四种不同的超声切割器。一个制造商提供了两种仪器:一种是传统仪器,另一种是改进版本,专门设计用于减少雾气排放。

结果

最快的超声切割器产生的干扰雾气最多。然而,改进的切割效率与雾气产生并不呈线性相关。这一点在改进后的“减少雾气产生仪器”中表现得尤为明显,它的切割速度比可比的标准切割器快,但产生的雾气明显更少。

结论

超声剪切器可有效用于无血组织切割,但雾气产生可能会妨碍手术进行。本研究的结果表明,不仅可以通过降低切割功率(导致切割时间延长)来减少雾气排放,还可以通过改进仪器的技术设计来减少雾气排放。因此,超声切割设备的进一步发展应考虑到所需的结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of mist production and tissue dissection efficiency using different types of ultrasound shears.评估不同类型的超声剪切刀产生的雾状颗粒和组织分离效率。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2822-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0512-5. Epub 2009 May 23.
2
Design of a test system for the development of advanced video chips and software algorithms.用于先进视频芯片和软件算法开发的测试系统设计。
Surg Innov. 2015 Apr;22(2):155-62. doi: 10.1177/1553350614537563. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
3
[Dissection technique--is ultrasound the best method?].[解剖技术——超声是最佳方法吗?]
Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2001;118:69-70.
4
Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins.用于静脉封闭的扭转模式与线性模式超声凝固剪的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Dec;18(6):819-24. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0066.
5
Implementation of a novel efficacy score to compare sealing and cutting devices in a porcine model.新型疗效评分系统在猪模型中比较密封和切割设备的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):1002-1011. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5778-4. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术的能量来源:传统电外科、双极计算机控制电外科与超声解剖的前瞻性随机比较。手术结果及成本分析。
Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):339-44. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200409.
7
[Use of a water-jet dissector during hepatectomy].肝切除术中水刀分离器的应用
Ann Chir. 2000 May;125(4):370-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00204-2.
8
Experience and dissection device are more relevant than patient-related factors for operation time in laparoscopic sigmoid resection-a retrospective 8-year observational study.在腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术中,经验和解剖器械比患者相关因素对手术时间更具影响——一项为期8年的回顾性观察研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1703-1710. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2896-3. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Laminar and turbulent surgical plume characteristics generated from curved- and straight-blade laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors.由弯形和直形刀片腹腔镜超声解剖器产生的层流和湍流手术烟雾特性。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1674-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3369-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy.超声刀有助于腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Arch Surg. 1992 Oct;127(10):1195-8; discussion 1198-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420100053009.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of suction-tip forceps, a new tool for laparoscopic surgery, for gastric cancer.评价一种新型腹腔镜手术工具——吸引管活检钳在胃癌治疗中的安全性和有效性。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Apr;14(2):232-240. doi: 10.1111/ases.12858. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors: technology update by a review of literature.腹腔镜超声解剖器:通过文献综述的技术更新
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Dec 27;12:1-7. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S113262. eCollection 2019.
3
Surgical Efficacy Among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors: Are We Advancing Safely? A Review of Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT).腹腔镜设备的温度安全概况:超声刀(ACE)、血管闭合系统(LV)和等离子切割器(PT)。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jun;22(6):1464-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9650-9. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
2
In vivo comparison of the coagulation capability of SonoSurg and Harmonic Ace on 4 mm and 5 mm arteries.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2203-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9345-2. Epub 2007 May 4.
3
Laparoscopic bowel resection: a comparison of three ultrasonically activated devices.腹腔镜肠切除术:三种超声激活设备的比较
腹腔镜超声解剖器的手术疗效:我们是否在安全推进?文献综述
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Oct;65(5):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0774-x. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
Significance of surgical plume obstruction during laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术中手术烟雾阻塞的意义。
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00269.
5
Laminar and turbulent surgical plume characteristics generated from curved- and straight-blade laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors.由弯形和直形刀片腹腔镜超声解剖器产生的层流和湍流手术烟雾特性。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1674-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3369-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
JSLS. 2003 Jan-Mar;7(1):19-22.
4
Acute thermal injury to the canine jejunal free flap: electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection.犬空肠游离皮瓣的急性热损伤:电灼与超声解剖
Am Surg. 1999 Apr;65(4):334-7.
5
Ultrasonic dissection for endoscopic surgery. The E.A.E.S. Technology Group.用于内镜手术的超声解剖。欧洲内镜外科学会技术组。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Apr;13(4):412-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649901002.
6
Cells are present in the smoke created during laparoscopic surgery.细胞存在于腹腔镜手术过程中产生的烟雾中。
Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):993-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840724.