Suppr超能文献

瑞典初级保健患者对确定优先事项的态度。

Primary care patients' attitudes to priority setting in Sweden.

作者信息

Arvidsson Eva, André Malin, Borgquist Lars, Lindström Kjell, Carlsson Per

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Health, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(2):123-8. doi: 10.1080/02813430902883901.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse attitudes to priority setting among patients in Swedish primary healthcare.

DESIGN

A questionnaire was given to patients comprising statements on attitudes towards prioritizing, on the role of politicians and healthcare staff in prioritizing, and on patient satisfaction with the outcome of their contact with primary healthcare (PHC).

SETTINGS

Four healthcare centres in Sweden, chosen through purposive sampling.

PARTICIPANTS

All the patients in contact with the health centres during a two-week period in 2004 (2517 questionnaires, 72% returned).

MAIN OUTCOMES

Patient attitudes to priority setting and satisfaction with the outcome of their contact.

RESULTS

More than 75% of the patients agreed with statements like "Public health services should always provide the best possible care, irrespective of cost". Almost three-quarters of the patients wanted healthcare staff rather than politicians to make decisions on priority setting. Younger patients and males were more positive towards priority setting and they also had a more positive view of the role of politicians. Less than 10% of the patients experienced some kind of economic rationing but the majority of these patients were satisfied with their contact with primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care patient opinions concerning priority setting are a challenge for both politicians and GPs. The fact that males and younger patients are less negative to prioritizing may pave the way for a future dialogue between politicians and the general public.

摘要

目的

分析瑞典初级医疗保健中患者对确定优先事项的态度。

设计

向患者发放一份问卷,其中包含关于对确定优先事项的态度、政治家和医护人员在确定优先事项中的作用以及患者对其与初级医疗保健(PHC)接触结果的满意度的陈述。

地点

通过目的抽样在瑞典选取了四个医疗中心。

参与者

2004年两周内与这些医疗中心有接触的所有患者(共发放2517份问卷,回收率为72%)。

主要结果

患者对确定优先事项的态度以及对其接触结果的满意度。

结果

超过75%的患者同意诸如“公共卫生服务应始终提供尽可能最好的护理,而不考虑成本”这样的陈述。近四分之三的患者希望医护人员而非政治家来决定优先事项。年轻患者和男性对确定优先事项更为积极,他们对政治家作用的看法也更积极。不到10%的患者经历过某种形式的经济限制,但这些患者中的大多数对其与初级医疗保健的接触感到满意。

结论

初级医疗保健患者对确定优先事项的看法对政治家和全科医生来说都是一项挑战。男性和年轻患者对确定优先事项的负面态度较弱这一事实可能为政治家与公众未来的对话铺平道路。

相似文献

1
Primary care patients' attitudes to priority setting in Sweden.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(2):123-8. doi: 10.1080/02813430902883901.
2
Attitudes towards priority-setting and rationing in healthcare -- an exploratory survey of Swedish medical students.
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):122-30. doi: 10.1177/1403494808100276. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
3
Setting priorities in primary health care--on whose conditions? A questionnaire study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Nov 26;13:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-114.
4
Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?
Scand J Public Health. 2014 May;42(3):227-34. doi: 10.1177/1403494813520355. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
Public dialogue on healthcare prioritisation.
Health Policy. 2006 Nov;79(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
7
The views of physicians and politicians concerning age-related prioritisation in healthcare.
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(1):38-52. doi: 10.1108/14777260910942542.
8
Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey.
Health Policy. 1999 Oct;49(1-2):75-135. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00044-5.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Health Policies Based on Patient Satisfaction: A Bibliometric Study.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 8;9(11):1520. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111520.
4
Setting priorities in primary health care--on whose conditions? A questionnaire study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Nov 26;13:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-114.
5
Thorny questions on the way to disclosing rationing.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):347-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823291ea.

本文引用的文献

1
Social capital, political trust and self rated-health: a population-based study in southern Sweden.
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jan;36(1):28-34. doi: 10.1177/1403494807085078.
2
The association between patient shortage and patient satisfaction with general practitioners.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Sep;25(3):133-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430701286579.
3
Triage for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: do patients agree on who should come first?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 25;7:118. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-118.
4
Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
6
Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.
Health Expect. 2002 Mar;5(1):47-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00157.x.
7
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers.
Philos Public Aff. 1997 Fall;26(4):303-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x.
8
Should physicians be gatekeepers of medical resources?
J Med Ethics. 2001 Aug;27(4):268-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.268.
9
Predictors of patient satisfaction.
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Feb;52(4):609-20. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00164-7.
10
Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care.
Health Policy. 2001 Feb;55(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00122-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验