Suppr超能文献

局部复发性鼻咽癌患者采用外照射放疗联合或不联合近距离放疗的再放疗。

Reirradiation of locally recurrent nasopharynx cancer with external beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.055.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine survival rates of patients with locally recurrent nasopharynx cancer (LRNPC) treated with modern therapeutic modalities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 1996 to March 2008, 29 patients were reirradiated for LRNPC. Thirteen patients received combined-modality treatment (CMT), consisting of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy, whereas 16 received EBRT alone. The median age was 50 years, 59% were male, 38% were Asian, 69% had World Health Organization Class III histology, and 86% were treated for their first recurrence. Nine, 6, 8, and 6 patients had recurrent Stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. Patients in the EBRT-alone group had more advanced disease. Median time to reirradiation was 3.9 years. In total, 93% underwent imaging with positron emission tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging before reirradiation, 83% received intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and 93% received chemotherapy, which was platinum-based in 85% of cases.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 45 months and for surviving patients was 54 months. Five-year actuarial local control, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were 52%, 44%, and 60%, respectively. No difference was observed between patients treated with EBRT or CMT. Overall survival was superior in patients who achieved local control (p = 0.0003). The incidence of late Grade > or =3 events in patients re-treated with EBRT alone was significantly increased compared with those receiving CMT (73% vs. 8%; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In this modern reirradiation series of patients with LRNPC, favorable overall survival compared with historical series was achieved. Patients treated with CMT experienced significantly fewer severe late effects compared with those treated with EBRT.

摘要

目的

确定采用现代治疗方式治疗局部复发性鼻咽癌(LRNPC)患者的生存率。

方法与材料

1996 年 7 月至 2008 年 3 月,29 例 LRNPC 患者接受了再放疗。13 例患者接受了联合治疗(CMT),包括外照射放疗(EBRT)后腔内近距离放疗,而 16 例患者仅接受 EBRT。中位年龄为 50 岁,59%为男性,38%为亚洲人,69%为世界卫生组织(WHO)III 级组织学类型,86%为首次复发。9、6、8 和 6 例患者分别为复发性 I、II、III 和 IV 期疾病。EBRT 组患者疾病更为晚期。中位再放疗时间为 3.9 年。共有 93%的患者在再放疗前进行了正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和/或磁共振成像(MRI)检查,83%的患者接受了调强放疗(IMRT),93%的患者接受了化疗,其中 85%的患者使用了铂类药物。

结果

所有患者的中位随访时间为 45 个月,存活患者的中位随访时间为 54 个月。5 年局部无进展生存率、无事件生存率和总生存率分别为 52%、44%和 60%。EBRT 与 CMT 治疗的患者之间未观察到差异。达到局部控制的患者总生存率更高(p=0.0003)。与接受 CMT 的患者相比,仅接受 EBRT 治疗的患者发生晚期>或=3 级事件的发生率显著增加(73%比 8%;p=0.005)。

结论

在本 LRNPC 患者的现代再放疗系列中,与历史系列相比,总体生存率较好。与接受 EBRT 治疗的患者相比,接受 CMT 治疗的患者发生严重晚期并发症的风险显著降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验