Osorio Luis, Lima Estêvão, Autorino Riccardo, Marcelo Filinto
Department of Urology, Santo Antonio General Hospital, Oporto, Portugal.
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):461-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44248.
Most ureteral stones can be observed with reasonable expectation of uneventful stone passage. When an active ureteral stone treatment is warranted, the best procedure to choose is dependent on several factors, besides stone size and location, including operators' experience, patients' preference, available equipment and related costs. Placement of double-J stent or nephrostomy tube represents the classical procedures performed in a renal colic due to acute ureteral obstruction when the conservative drug therapy does not resolve the symptoms. These maneuvers are usually followed by ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, which currently represent the mainstay of treatment for ureteral stones. In this review paper a literature search was performed to identify reports dealing with emergency management of renal colic due to ureteral stones. The main aspects related to this debated issue are analyzed and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option are carefully discussed.
大多数输尿管结石可以通过观察,合理预期结石能顺利排出。当有必要对输尿管结石进行积极治疗时,除结石大小和位置外,最佳治疗方法的选择还取决于几个因素,包括术者经验、患者偏好、可用设备及相关费用。当保守药物治疗无法缓解症状时,置入双J支架或肾造瘘管是因急性输尿管梗阻导致肾绞痛时所采用的经典操作。这些操作之后通常会进行输尿管镜检查或体外冲击波碎石术,这两种方法目前是输尿管结石治疗的主要手段。在这篇综述论文中,进行了文献检索以识别有关输尿管结石所致肾绞痛急诊处理的报告。分析了与这个有争议问题相关的主要方面,并仔细讨论了每种治疗选择的优缺点。