Endourology and Stone Services, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
Few studies show that "emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL)" reduces the incidence of ureteroscopy in patients with ureteric calculi. We assess success of eESWL and look to study and identify factors which predict successful outcome. We retrospectively studied patients presenting with their first episode of ureteric colic undergoing eESWL (within 72 h of presentation) over a 5-year period. Patient's age, gender, stone size and location, time between presentation and ESWL, number of shock waves and ESWL sessions, and Hounsfield units (HU) were recorded. 97 patients (mean age 40 years; 76 males, 21 females) were included. 71 patients were stone free after eESWL (73.2 %) (group 1) and 26 patients failed treatment and proceeded to ureteroscopy (group 2). The two groups were well matched for age and gender. Mean stone size in group 1 and 2 was 6.4 mm and 7.7 mm, respectively, (p = 0.00141). Stone location was 34, 21, and 16 in upper, middle and lower ureter in group 1 compared to 11, 5, and 10 in group 2, respectively. Mean HU in group 1 was 480 and 612 in group 2 (p value 0.0036). In group 2, significantly, more patients received treatment after 24 h compared with group 1 (38 vs 22.5 %). The number of shock waves, maximal intensity, and ESWL sessions were not significantly different in the two groups. No complications were noted. eESWL is safe and effective in patients with ureteric colic. Stone size and Hounsfield units are important factors in predicting success. Early treatment (≤24 h) minimizes stone impaction and increases the success rate of ESWL.
很少有研究表明“急诊体外冲击波碎石术 (eESWL)”可降低输尿管结石患者接受输尿管镜检查的发生率。我们评估了 eESWL 的成功率,并研究和确定了预测成功结果的因素。我们对 5 年内首次出现输尿管绞痛并接受 eESWL(就诊后 72 小时内)的患者进行了回顾性研究。记录了患者的年龄、性别、结石大小和位置、就诊与 ESWL 之间的时间、冲击波数量和 ESWL 次数以及亨氏单位 (HU)。共纳入 97 例患者(平均年龄 40 岁;76 名男性,21 名女性)。71 例患者 eESWL 后结石完全清除(73.2%)(组 1),26 例患者治疗失败并接受输尿管镜检查(组 2)。两组患者的年龄和性别相匹配。组 1 和 2 的平均结石大小分别为 6.4mm 和 7.7mm(p=0.00141)。组 1 中输尿管上段、中段和下段结石分别为 34、21 和 16 例,而组 2 中分别为 11、5 和 10 例。组 1 的平均 HU 值为 480,组 2 为 612(p 值 0.0036)。在组 2 中,明显更多的患者在就诊后 24 小时内接受治疗,而组 1 中为 38 例(22.5%)。两组间冲击波数量、最大强度和 ESWL 次数无显著差异。两组均未出现并发症。eESWL 治疗输尿管绞痛安全有效。结石大小和 HU 值是预测成功的重要因素。早期治疗(≤24 小时)可减少结石嵌顿并提高 ESWL 的成功率。