• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors predicting success of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL) in ureteric calculi--a single centre experience from the United Kingdom (UK).预测急诊体外冲击波碎石术(eESWL)治疗输尿管结石成功的因素——来自英国(UK)的单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
2
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A study on feasibility and efficacy in stone clearance and reducing morbidity in ureteric and renal stones with colic.急诊体外冲击波碎石术:研究其在缓解输尿管和肾结石绞痛方面的结石清除率和降低发病率的可行性和疗效。
Urologia. 2023 Aug;90(3):516-521. doi: 10.1177/03915603221140444. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi--a comparative assessment of efficacy and safety.体外冲击波碎石术与体内碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石——疗效与安全性的比较评估
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004 Jan;33(1):80-3.
4
Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.输尿管中下段结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术与激光输尿管镜检查。成本、发病率及有效性的比较
Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):31-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00510.x.
5
Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.利尿对输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石治疗的影响。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36(3):209-12. doi: 10.1080/003655902320131893.
6
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管远端结石:经臀入路可显著提高结石清除率。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
7
Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的对比研究
BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(8):1144-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08500.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
8
Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期疗效的前瞻性随机评估
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
9
The Efficacy of Early Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones.早期体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效
Urol J. 2019 Aug 18;16(4):331-336. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4537.
10
TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.TISU:体外冲击波碎石术作为输尿管结石的首选治疗方案与直接进行输尿管镜治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 22;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2652-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效:Meta 分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5.
2
Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对有症状的输尿管结石患者行急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗结局的预测模型的开发和验证:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 31;51(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01401-7.
3
Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic.预测急性肾绞痛急诊冲击波碎石术成功的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
The impact of delaying acute kidney stone surgery on outcomes.延迟急性肾结石手术对治疗结果的影响。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Aug;15(8):E418-E422. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6877.
5
Predicting stone composition before treatment - can it really drive clinical decisions?治疗前预测结石成分——它真的能指导临床决策吗?
Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(4):392-6. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art15. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients.紧急冲击波碎石术作为输尿管结石的一线治疗方法:对570例患者的荟萃分析
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):725-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0484-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.
3
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Urgent ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 681 patients.急诊输尿管镜检查作为输尿管结石的一线治疗:对681例患者的荟萃分析
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0469-z. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
5
Medical malpractice in endourology: analysis of closed cases from the State of New York.泌尿外科医疗事故:纽约州封存案例分析。
J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):528-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.045. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Urolithiasis--medical therapies.尿石症——医学疗法。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108 Suppl 2:9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10688.x.
7
The calcium-sensing receptor affects fat accumulation via effects on antilipolytic pathways in adipose tissue of rats fed low-calcium diets.钙敏感受体通过对低钙饮食喂养大鼠脂肪组织抗脂肪分解途径的影响影响脂肪积累。
J Nutr. 2011 Nov;141(11):1938-46. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.141762. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department.随机前瞻性试验比较了急诊就诊的肾功能正常的输尿管结石患者即刻与延迟行输尿管镜检查的效果。
J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1137-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0554. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
9
Medical expulsive therapy using alfuzosin for patient presenting with ureteral stone less than 10mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial.应用阿夫唑嗪行医学排石疗法治疗小于 10mm 的输尿管结石患者:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Urol. 2011 Jul;18(7):510-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02780.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
10
Emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi: a retrospective study.输尿管结石所致急性肾绞痛的急诊输尿管镜碎石术:一项回顾性研究
Urol Res. 2011 Dec;39(6):497-501. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0381-y. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

预测急诊体外冲击波碎石术(eESWL)治疗输尿管结石成功的因素——来自英国(UK)的单中心经验。

Factors predicting success of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL) in ureteric calculi--a single centre experience from the United Kingdom (UK).

机构信息

Endourology and Stone Services, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9. Epub 2013 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9
PMID:23748923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7120875/
Abstract

Few studies show that "emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL)" reduces the incidence of ureteroscopy in patients with ureteric calculi. We assess success of eESWL and look to study and identify factors which predict successful outcome. We retrospectively studied patients presenting with their first episode of ureteric colic undergoing eESWL (within 72 h of presentation) over a 5-year period. Patient's age, gender, stone size and location, time between presentation and ESWL, number of shock waves and ESWL sessions, and Hounsfield units (HU) were recorded. 97 patients (mean age 40 years; 76 males, 21 females) were included. 71 patients were stone free after eESWL (73.2 %) (group 1) and 26 patients failed treatment and proceeded to ureteroscopy (group 2). The two groups were well matched for age and gender. Mean stone size in group 1 and 2 was 6.4 mm and 7.7 mm, respectively, (p = 0.00141). Stone location was 34, 21, and 16 in upper, middle and lower ureter in group 1 compared to 11, 5, and 10 in group 2, respectively. Mean HU in group 1 was 480 and 612 in group 2 (p value 0.0036). In group 2, significantly, more patients received treatment after 24 h compared with group 1 (38 vs 22.5 %). The number of shock waves, maximal intensity, and ESWL sessions were not significantly different in the two groups. No complications were noted. eESWL is safe and effective in patients with ureteric colic. Stone size and Hounsfield units are important factors in predicting success. Early treatment (≤24 h) minimizes stone impaction and increases the success rate of ESWL.

摘要

很少有研究表明“急诊体外冲击波碎石术 (eESWL)”可降低输尿管结石患者接受输尿管镜检查的发生率。我们评估了 eESWL 的成功率,并研究和确定了预测成功结果的因素。我们对 5 年内首次出现输尿管绞痛并接受 eESWL(就诊后 72 小时内)的患者进行了回顾性研究。记录了患者的年龄、性别、结石大小和位置、就诊与 ESWL 之间的时间、冲击波数量和 ESWL 次数以及亨氏单位 (HU)。共纳入 97 例患者(平均年龄 40 岁;76 名男性,21 名女性)。71 例患者 eESWL 后结石完全清除(73.2%)(组 1),26 例患者治疗失败并接受输尿管镜检查(组 2)。两组患者的年龄和性别相匹配。组 1 和 2 的平均结石大小分别为 6.4mm 和 7.7mm(p=0.00141)。组 1 中输尿管上段、中段和下段结石分别为 34、21 和 16 例,而组 2 中分别为 11、5 和 10 例。组 1 的平均 HU 值为 480,组 2 为 612(p 值 0.0036)。在组 2 中,明显更多的患者在就诊后 24 小时内接受治疗,而组 1 中为 38 例(22.5%)。两组间冲击波数量、最大强度和 ESWL 次数无显著差异。两组均未出现并发症。eESWL 治疗输尿管绞痛安全有效。结石大小和 HU 值是预测成功的重要因素。早期治疗(≤24 小时)可减少结石嵌顿并提高 ESWL 的成功率。