Suppr超能文献

膝关节韧带重建术后芬太尼或舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛:比较研究

Patient controlled analgesia with fentanyl or sufentanil in the postoperative period of knee ligament reconstruction: comparative study.

作者信息

Lutti Marcelo Negrão, Vieira João Lopes, Eickhoff Dante Roberto, de Carli Daniel, de Carvalho Marcelo Antônio

机构信息

CET/SBA do Instituto Penido Burnier, Campinas, SP.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002 Apr;52(2):166-74.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Epidural opioids, associated or not to local anesthetics, have been used for postoperative analgesia in continuous infusion and/or patient controlled boluses. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative analgesia provided by epidural fentanyl or sufentanil, in bolus or continuous infusion, in patients submitted to knee ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

Seventy ASA I - II patients, aged 16 to 47 years, were randomly distributed in two groups. All patients were submitted to epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine (100 mg) with epinephrine 1:200,000 associated to fentanyl (100 mg). At the end of the procedure, patients received epidural fentanyl (Group F) or sufentanil (Group S) in continuous infusion plus patient controlled boluses. Group F infusion solution was made of saline (85 ml), 500 microg fentanyl (10 ml) and 0.5% bupivacaine (5 ml). Group S solution was made of saline (92 ml), 150 microg sufentanil (3 ml) and 0.5% plain bupivacaine (5 ml). Infusion pump's flow was initially programmed to 5 ml h(-1), with 2 ml patient controlled bolus doses every 15 minutes at most, for both groups. The following parameters were compared: pain, number of patient controlled boluses, opioid consumption, motor block, sedation and side-effects.

RESULTS

There have been no statistically significant difference in analgesia quality between groups, being in most cases rated good (AVS 0 to 2). There has been a significant difference in the number of patient controlled boluses, with Group F needing more boluses than Group S. There has been no difference in total infused solution volume and total infusion time. There has been no motor block after beginning of patient-controlled analgesia. Vomiting and urine retention incidences were higher in Group S and there have been no significant differences in sedation and pruritus between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural fentanyl or sufentanil in continuous epidural infusion and patient-controlled boluses in the doses used in this study have induced excellent postoperative analgesia. However, sufentanil caused more severe side effects than fentanyl.

摘要

背景与目的

硬膜外使用阿片类药物,无论是否联合局部麻醉药,都已用于术后持续输注和/或患者自控推注镇痛。本研究的目的是比较在接受膝关节韧带重建的患者中,硬膜外推注或持续输注芬太尼或舒芬太尼所提供的术后镇痛效果。

方法

70例年龄在16至47岁的ASA I-II级患者被随机分为两组。所有患者均接受0.5%布比卡因(100mg)与1:200,000肾上腺素联合芬太尼(100mg)的硬膜外麻醉。手术结束时,患者接受持续输注加患者自控推注的硬膜外芬太尼(F组)或舒芬太尼(S组)。F组输注溶液由生理盐水(85ml)、500μg芬太尼(10ml)和0.5%布比卡因(5ml)组成。S组溶液由生理盐水(92ml)、150μg舒芬太尼(3ml)和0.5%普通布比卡因(5ml)组成。两组输注泵的流速最初均设定为5ml h(-1),患者自控推注剂量最多每15分钟2ml。比较以下参数:疼痛、患者自控推注次数、阿片类药物消耗量、运动阻滞、镇静和副作用。

结果

两组间镇痛质量无统计学显著差异,大多数情况下评分良好(视觉模拟评分法0至2分)。患者自控推注次数有显著差异,F组比S组需要更多的推注次数。总输注溶液体积和总输注时间无差异。患者自控镇痛开始后无运动阻滞。S组呕吐和尿潴留发生率较高,两组间镇静和瘙痒无显著差异。

结论

本研究中使用的剂量进行硬膜外持续输注和患者自控推注的硬膜外芬太尼或舒芬太尼均产生了良好的术后镇痛效果。然而,舒芬太尼比芬太尼引起更严重的副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验