Moskovitz Moti, Abud Wassim, Ram Diana
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Spring;33(3):259-64. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.33.3.r3p7351l5x52737u.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an oral health education program when given in a public dental clinic, by assessing caries and restorations.
This was done by assessing changes in caries prevalence in the mouth of children aged 12 to 14 year- old. Data was obtained from files of patients treated in the Dental Volunteers for Israel (DVI) clinic in Jerusalem. Children must prove understanding and also application of what they learned in the educational program in order to receive restorative dental treatment.
280 children were included in the intervention group. The control group constituted 173 children who had never had any restorative treatment in the DVI clinic. The extent of caries surfaces differed greatly between the intervention and the control groups. 35.2% of the control group, and as many as 64% of the intervention group had low caries (DMFS < 3). The situation is reversed when comparing the difference in the restored teeth surfaces between the two groups--56.6% of the control group had no restorations and 66.2% of the children in the intervention group had treated teeth. DMFS scores reveal fewer differences between the two groups. The mean carious surface was 1.8 times greater in the control group, and the restored surfaces were 2.1 times greater for the intervention children. Nevertheless when comparing DMFS means between control and intervention groups t-test result shows no statistical significant difference for the slightly lower DMFS levels in the intervention group.
This study shows that even a comprehensive preventive program given by professional personnel, followed by free dental treatment, is not enough to improve dental health status for children from a lower socioeconomic class. Still, a consideration of the ethical responsibility of the profession to educate children about oral diseases and their prevention should be carried out, irrespective of the implementation of the knowledge.
通过评估龋齿和修复情况,评价在公共牙科诊所开展的口腔健康教育项目的效果。
通过评估12至14岁儿童口腔中龋齿患病率的变化来完成。数据取自耶路撒冷以色列牙科志愿者(DVI)诊所治疗的患者档案。儿童必须证明他们理解并应用了在教育项目中学到的知识,才能接受牙齿修复治疗。
干预组纳入280名儿童。对照组由173名从未在DVI诊所接受过任何修复治疗的儿童组成。干预组和对照组的龋面范围差异很大。对照组中有35.2%,干预组中多达64%的儿童龋齿程度较低(乳牙龋失补牙面数<3)。比较两组修复牙齿表面的差异时情况则相反——对照组中有56.6%没有修复,干预组中有66.2%的儿童接受了牙齿治疗。乳牙龋失补牙面数评分显示两组之间差异较小。对照组的平均龋面是干预组的1.8倍,干预组儿童的修复面是对照组的2.1倍。然而,比较对照组和干预组的乳牙龋失补牙面数均值时,t检验结果显示干预组乳牙龋失补牙面数略低,但无统计学显著差异。
本研究表明,即使由专业人员开展全面的预防项目并提供免费牙齿治疗,也不足以改善社会经济地位较低阶层儿童的口腔健康状况。尽管如此,仍应考虑该行业对儿童进行口腔疾病及其预防教育的道德责任,无论知识的实际应用情况如何。