Abel S, Kearns R A
Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(7):825-34. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90387-r.
In New Zealand until the 1920s, most births occurred at home or in small maternity hospitals under the care of a midwife. Births subsequently came under the control of the medical profession and the prevalent medical ideology continues to support hospitalised birth in the interests of safety for mother and child. Despite resistance from the medical profession, recent (1990) legislation has reinstated the autonomy of midwives and this has come at a time when the demand for home births is increasing. This paper locates these changes within the geographical context of home as a primary place within human experience. It is argued that the medical profession has been an agent of an essentially patriarchal society in engendering particular experiences of time and place for women in labour. Narrative data indicate that the choice of home as a birth place is related to three dimensions of experience unavailable in a hospital context: control, continuity and the familiarity of home.
在20世纪20年代之前的新西兰,大多数分娩是在家中或小型妇产医院里,由助产士照料下进行的。随后,分娩受到了医学专业的控制,盛行的医学观念继续支持住院分娩,认为这有利于母婴安全。尽管遭到医学专业人士的抵制,但最近(1990年)的立法恢复了助产士的自主权,而这恰逢家庭分娩需求不断增加之时。本文将这些变化置于家庭这一人类经历中的主要场所的地理背景中。有人认为,医学专业在为分娩中的女性营造特定的时间和场所体验方面,一直是一个本质上父权制社会的推动者。叙事数据表明,选择在家中分娩与医院环境中无法获得的三个体验维度有关:控制权、连续性以及家的熟悉感。