• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《残疾评估量表(DAS,第二版)》的评估者间信度:一项意大利的研究。

Inter-rater reliability of the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS, version II). An Italian study.

作者信息

Ardoin M P, Faccincani C, Galati M, Gavioli I, Mignolli G

机构信息

Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Università di Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 Aug;26(4):147-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00795205.

DOI:10.1007/BF00795205
PMID:1948293
Abstract

The paper describes a reliability study conducted on the Italian version of the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS II). Thirty patients were included in the study. They were drawn from those who contacted the South-Verona Community Psychiatric Service. Each patient was assessed by two raters who were assigned to the roles of interviewer and observer in a balanced, randomized way. Several statistical indices of reliability were calculated for the interviewer-observer comparison. The interview showed an overall good reliability. The lowest values were found for those items where the social and cultural expectations on "normal behaviour" are more variable. Section 3 of the DAS was considered in general not applicable, and the authors opinion is that it should be reconsidered for its use in the Italian situation.

摘要

本文描述了一项针对《残疾评估量表》(DAS II)意大利语版本的信度研究。该研究纳入了30名患者,他们来自联系南维罗纳社区精神科服务的人群。每位患者由两名评估者进行评估,这两名评估者被随机均衡地分配为访谈者和观察者的角色。针对访谈者与观察者的比较计算了几个信度统计指标。访谈总体显示出良好的信度。在那些关于“正常行为”的社会和文化期望变化较大的项目中,信度值最低。DAS的第3部分总体上被认为不适用,作者认为应重新考虑其在意大利情况下的使用。

相似文献

1
Inter-rater reliability of the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS, version II). An Italian study.《残疾评估量表(DAS,第二版)》的评估者间信度:一项意大利的研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 Aug;26(4):147-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00795205.
2
The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)拟议的轴V(残疾)的可靠性和有效性。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;165(5):683-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.5.683.
3
Axis V revisited.重新审视轴V。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Oct;54(10):1413. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1413.
4
A modified GAF scale.一种改良的全球功能评估(GAF)量表。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;45(6):611. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.6.611.
5
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
6
Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale.功能总体评定。一种修订量表。
Psychosomatics. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71666-8.
7
[Social Autonomy Scale. First validation data].[社会自主量表。首次验证数据]
Encephale. 1998 Mar-Apr;24(2):108-19.
8
Diagnosing psychotic disorders: validity, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DIP). Italian version.诊断精神障碍:精神病诊断访谈(DIP)的效度、信度及应用。意大利语版本。
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):33-43.
9
The Ward Daily Behaviour Scale.病房日常行为量表
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;165(1):87-93. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.1.87.
10
Daily life dialogue assessment in psychiatric care-face validity and inter-rater reliability of a tool based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.精神科护理中的日常生活对话评估——基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的工具的表面效度和评分者间信度
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Dec;27(6):306-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.制定世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of mental health services over a given period.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):404-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09721.x.
2
Social disability and outcome in schizophrenic patients.精神分裂症患者的社会残疾与预后
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;147:631-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.6.631.
3
High and long-term users of the mental health services. A case-register study in Italy.
Soc Psychiatry. 1986;21(2):96-103. doi: 10.1007/BF00578749.
4
The assessment of social adjustment. A review of techniques.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975 Mar;32(3):357-65. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760210091006.