• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0。

Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

机构信息

World Health Organization, avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.09.067231
PMID:21076562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2971503/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for measuring functioning and disability in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHODAS 2.0 is a standard metric for ensuring scientific comparability across different populations.

METHODS

A series of studies was carried out globally. Over 65,000 respondents drawn from the general population and from specific patient populations were interviewed by trained interviewers who applied the WHODAS 2.0 (with 36 items in its full version and 12 items in a shortened version).

FINDINGS

The WHODAS 2.0 was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, α: 0.86), a stable factor structure; high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98); good concurrent validity in patient classification when compared with other recognized disability measurement instruments; conformity to Rasch scaling properties across populations, and good responsiveness (i.e. sensitivity to change). Effect sizes ranged from 0.44 to 1.38 for different health interventions targeting various health conditions.

CONCLUSION

The WHODAS 2.0 meets the need for a robust instrument that can be easily administered to measure the impact of health conditions, monitor the effectiveness of interventions and estimate the burden of both mental and physical disorders across different populations.

摘要

目的

根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》描述世界卫生组织残疾评定量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的制定过程,以衡量功能和残疾。WHODAS 2.0 是确保不同人群之间科学可比性的标准衡量标准。

方法

在全球范围内进行了一系列研究。通过受过培训的访谈者对来自一般人群和特定患者人群的超过 65,000 名受访者进行了访谈,他们使用 WHODAS 2.0(全版本有 36 个项目,简化版本有 12 个项目)进行访谈。

结果

WHODAS 2.0 具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha,α:0.86)、稳定的因素结构;高测试重测可靠性(组内相关系数:0.98);与其他公认的残疾测量工具相比,在患者分类方面具有良好的同时有效性;在不同人群中符合 Rasch 刻度属性,并且具有良好的反应性(即对变化的敏感性)。针对不同健康状况的不同健康干预措施的效果大小范围为 0.44 至 1.38。

结论

WHODAS 2.0 满足了对一种强大工具的需求,该工具易于管理,可用于衡量健康状况的影响、监测干预措施的有效性,并估计不同人群中精神和身体障碍的负担。

相似文献

1
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.制定世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review.12 项自我管理世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在一般人群和非急性身体原因残疾人群中的心理测量特性 - 系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Mar;43(6):789-794. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在埃塞俄比亚农村重症精神障碍患者中的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3.
5
Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版中文版(WHODAS II CT)在中国残疾人和慢性病患者中的效度验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.989336. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
6
Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 在腰痛患者中的测量性能和最小重要变化:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.双相I型障碍中的残疾情况:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(36项)
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0.接受化疗的乳腺癌患者的活动受限和参与受限:WHODAS 2.0 中文版的心理测量特性和验证。
Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):897-906. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0212-9. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
9
Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire.脑卒中后活动和参与:土耳其版 IMPACT-S 问卷的效度和信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1912-1917. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)在多发性硬化症患者中的效度验证。
Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):448-56. doi: 10.1177/1352458514543732. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A latent profile analysis of positive psychotic symptoms and dissociative symptoms in the general population: their associations with childhood trauma and outcomes.普通人群中阳性精神病性症状和解离症状的潜在类别分析:它们与童年创伤及结局的关联。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02992-3.
2
Psychometric comparison and score conversion between World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and activities of daily living scales in community-dwelling older adults.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0与社区居住老年人日常生活活动量表之间的心理测量比较及分数转换
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01306-9.
3
Co-prioritization of mental health recovery outcomes and scales for community mental health centers in Peru.秘鲁社区心理健康中心心理健康康复结果与量表的共同优先排序
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13140-7.
4
Study protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with reappraisal training for treatment of cannabis use disorder.一项关于经颅直流电刺激联合重新评估训练治疗大麻使用障碍的先导性随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0328205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328205. eCollection 2025.
5
Work and recovery from substance use disorder in Veterans Affairs: Characteristics of veterans seeking work therapy and vocational rehabilitation.退伍军人事务部中物质使用障碍患者的工作与康复:寻求工作治疗和职业康复的退伍军人的特征
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/prj0000662.
6
The ILIA study: protocol for a randomized-controlled multicenter clinical trial on smartphone- and web-based relapse monitoring for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.ILIA研究:一项针对精神分裂症或精神分裂情感性障碍患者基于智能手机和网络的复发监测的随机对照多中心临床试验方案。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02089-7.
7
Defining Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: Recommendations From the ISBD Task Force.定义难治性双相抑郁:国际双相障碍学会(ISBD)工作组的建议
Bipolar Disord. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/bdi.70048.
8
Multifaceted analysis of presenteeism: contributions of pain, psychological factors and daily functioning - a cross-sectional study in Japan.出勤主义的多方面分析:疼痛、心理因素和日常功能的作用——日本的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e100243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100243.
9
Co-RESPOND: a federated network of cohorts on mental health and adversity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges, solutions and recommendations for retrospective data harmonization.Co-RESPOND:COVID-19大流行期间心理健康与逆境队列的联合网络。回顾性数据协调的挑战、解决方案与建议。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2517920. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2517920. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
10
Effect of internet-delivered exposure therapy versus healthy lifestyle promotion for patients with persistent physical symptoms (SOMEX1): a randomized controlled trial with planned moderator analysis.互联网提供的暴露疗法与促进健康生活方式对持续性躯体症状患者的影响(SOMEX1):一项带有计划调节分析的随机对照试验
Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 8;55:e226. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101244.

本文引用的文献

1
The schedule for assessment of psychiatric disability - a modification of the das-ii.精神残疾评估时间表 - das-ii 的修订版。
Indian J Psychiatry. 1988 Jan;30(1):47-53.
2
Contribution of chronic diseases to disability in elderly people in countries with low and middle incomes: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey.低收入和中等收入国家慢性病对老年人残疾的影响:一项基于10/66痴呆症研究小组人群的调查。
Lancet. 2009 Nov 28;374(9704):1821-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61829-8.
3
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版:对意大利语版验证的贡献
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802240498.
4
Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在欧洲精神障碍流行病学研究中的心理测量特性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(4):185-97. doi: 10.1002/mpr.261.
5
The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版在早期炎症性关节炎中的测量学特性
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):382-90. doi: 10.1002/art.23314.
6
[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版在中风患者及其亲属中的应用:信度和评分者间信度》
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Feb;47(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985168.
7
Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.系统性硬化症患者的生活质量:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表II的心理测量特性
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb 15;59(2):270-8. doi: 10.1002/art.23343.
8
Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.创伤两年后严重多发伤的长期多维功能后果:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究
J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):461-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.ea.
9
Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders.通用有效性指标:焦虑症中对症状变化的敏感性。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Feb;90(2-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
10
The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版:在获得性听力损失成人功能性健康状况测量中的心理测量特性
Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):111-26. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900303.