Suppr超能文献

制定世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0。

Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

机构信息

World Health Organization, avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for measuring functioning and disability in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHODAS 2.0 is a standard metric for ensuring scientific comparability across different populations.

METHODS

A series of studies was carried out globally. Over 65,000 respondents drawn from the general population and from specific patient populations were interviewed by trained interviewers who applied the WHODAS 2.0 (with 36 items in its full version and 12 items in a shortened version).

FINDINGS

The WHODAS 2.0 was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, α: 0.86), a stable factor structure; high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98); good concurrent validity in patient classification when compared with other recognized disability measurement instruments; conformity to Rasch scaling properties across populations, and good responsiveness (i.e. sensitivity to change). Effect sizes ranged from 0.44 to 1.38 for different health interventions targeting various health conditions.

CONCLUSION

The WHODAS 2.0 meets the need for a robust instrument that can be easily administered to measure the impact of health conditions, monitor the effectiveness of interventions and estimate the burden of both mental and physical disorders across different populations.

摘要

目的

根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》描述世界卫生组织残疾评定量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的制定过程,以衡量功能和残疾。WHODAS 2.0 是确保不同人群之间科学可比性的标准衡量标准。

方法

在全球范围内进行了一系列研究。通过受过培训的访谈者对来自一般人群和特定患者人群的超过 65,000 名受访者进行了访谈,他们使用 WHODAS 2.0(全版本有 36 个项目,简化版本有 12 个项目)进行访谈。

结果

WHODAS 2.0 具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha,α:0.86)、稳定的因素结构;高测试重测可靠性(组内相关系数:0.98);与其他公认的残疾测量工具相比,在患者分类方面具有良好的同时有效性;在不同人群中符合 Rasch 刻度属性,并且具有良好的反应性(即对变化的敏感性)。针对不同健康状况的不同健康干预措施的效果大小范围为 0.44 至 1.38。

结论

WHODAS 2.0 满足了对一种强大工具的需求,该工具易于管理,可用于衡量健康状况的影响、监测干预措施的有效性,并估计不同人群中精神和身体障碍的负担。

相似文献

1
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.
7
Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1912-1917. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10

引用本文的文献

3
Co-prioritization of mental health recovery outcomes and scales for community mental health centers in Peru.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13140-7.

本文引用的文献

3
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802240498.
6
[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Feb;47(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985168.
9
Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders.
J Affect Disord. 2006 Feb;90(2-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验