CETESB-Cia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental, Av. Prof. Frederico, Hermann Jr., 345, São Paulo, Brazil.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010 Jan;51(1):31-8. doi: 10.1002/em.20504.
The objective of this study was to compare the responses of the Salmonella/microsome microsuspension assay with the new microplate fluctuation protocol (MPF) for the evaluation of the mutagenic activity of environmental samples. Organic extracts of total particulate atmospheric air samples, surface waters, and effluents were tested in dose-response experiments. The assays were performed with strain TA98 in the absence and presence of S9 mix. Both protocols produced similar results, despite the fact that the maximum score of the MPF is limited to 48 wells, whereas in the regular plate assay it is possible to count up to 1,500 colonies using an automatic counter. Similar sensitivities based on the lowest dose that resulted in a positive response were obtained for both assays. The MPF procedure is less laborious (e.g., all-liquid format, use of multichannel pipettors) and allows for automation of the pipetting and dispensing steps, thus, reducing time of the analysis which is particularly important in environmental quality monitoring programs or in effect-directed analysis. The results show that the MPF procedure is a promising tool to test environmental samples for mutagenic activity.
本研究旨在比较沙门氏菌/微粒体微悬浮液测定法与新的微板波动试验(MPF),以评估环境样品的致突变活性。对总颗粒物大气空气样品、地表水和废水的有机提取物进行了剂量反应试验。该试验使用 TA98 菌株在无 S9 混合液和有 S9 混合液的情况下进行。尽管 MPF 的最大评分限制为 48 孔,但两种方案产生了相似的结果,而在常规平板测定中,使用自动计数器可以最多计数 1500 个菌落。两种试验的最低剂量均能得到相似的灵敏度,以获得阳性反应。MPF 方法不那么费力(例如,全液体格式,使用多通道移液器),并且可以自动进行移液和分配步骤,从而减少分析时间,这在环境质量监测计划或定向分析中尤为重要。结果表明,MPF 程序是一种很有前途的工具,可以用于测试环境样品的致突变活性。