Murray J J
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Surg Clin North Am. 1991 Dec;71(6):1187-94. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45584-2.
Compared with the prolonged cumulative hospitalization and morbidity that accompany staged resection for the treatment of obstructing or inflammatory disorders of the left colon, our results confirm that resection with intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis is a safe alternative. In the absence of intraoperative lavage, all patients in our series would have required a multistage procedure. Intraoperative lavage with primary anastomosis does not challenge the accepted criteria for safe bowel anastomosis. Rather, it offers another means for meeting those criteria. This alternative should be considered in the management of any patient whose primary indication for colostomy is the lack of adequate mechanical preparation of the colon. Although our experience indicates that intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis can be employed safely in the treatment of inflammatory disorders of the colon, it is not recommended in the presence of fecal peritonitis, a large contiguous pelvic abscess, or systemic sepsis. In these individuals, the additional operating time required for intraoperative lavage and the potential consequences of anastomotic dehiscence pose too great a risk.
与分期切除治疗左半结肠梗阻或炎症性疾病所伴随的住院时间延长和发病率增加相比,我们的结果证实,术中灌洗并一期吻合的切除术是一种安全的替代方法。若不进行术中灌洗,我们系列研究中的所有患者都需要接受多阶段手术。术中灌洗并一期吻合并不违背公认的安全肠吻合标准。相反,它提供了满足这些标准的另一种方法。对于任何因结肠机械性准备不充分而主要行结肠造口术的患者,在治疗时都应考虑这种替代方法。尽管我们的经验表明,术中灌洗并一期吻合可安全地用于治疗结肠炎症性疾病,但在存在粪性腹膜炎、大面积相邻盆腔脓肿或全身性脓毒症的情况下不建议使用。对于这些患者,术中灌洗所需的额外手术时间以及吻合口裂开的潜在后果带来的风险太大。