Kressner U, Antonsson J, Ejerblad S, Gerdin B, Påhlman L
Department of Surgery, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur J Surg. 1994 May;160(5):287-92.
To assess whether intraoperative lavage and primary resection with anastomosis is a safe alternative to a Hartmann procedure in emergency surgery of the left colon.
Retrospective study.
University hospital.
101 consecutive patients (39 emergency and 62 elective) who underwent a left-sided colonic resection during a 3-year-period.
17 of the emergency procedures comprised an intraoperative lavage followed by resection and primary anastomosis without faecal diversion; 17 were Hartmann procedures and 5 patients had primary resection without lavage.
Postoperative mortality, morbidity and duration of hospital stay in these two groups compared with these after a contemporary series of elective resections.
There were no postoperative deaths and no clinical anastomotic leaks in the lavage group. The duration of hospital stay (median 11 days) was similar in both groups (overall and sigmoid resection respectively). In the Hartmann group, there were two deaths and the postoperative stay in hospital was significantly longer.
Primary resection with intraoperative lavage can be done successfully in patients with acute obstruction of the left colon and the duration of hospital stay and morbidity are similar to those seen in patients operated on electively.
评估在左半结肠急诊手术中,术中灌洗并一期切除吻合术是否是哈特曼手术的一种安全替代方案。
回顾性研究。
大学医院。
连续101例患者(39例急诊患者和62例择期手术患者)在3年期间接受了左半结肠切除术。
17例急诊手术包括术中灌洗,随后进行切除和一期吻合,不做粪便转流;17例为哈特曼手术,5例患者未进行灌洗直接进行一期切除。
将这两组患者的术后死亡率、发病率和住院时间与同期一系列择期切除术后的情况进行比较。
灌洗组无术后死亡病例,也无临床吻合口漏。两组(总体和乙状结肠切除分别计算)的住院时间(中位数11天)相似。在哈特曼组,有2例死亡,术后住院时间明显更长。
对于左半结肠急性梗阻患者,术中灌洗后一期切除手术可成功实施,住院时间和发病率与择期手术患者相似。