Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Sep;161(3):583-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09279.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
Lymphocytic infiltration of the skin (LIS) and reticular erythematous mucinosis (REM) are characterized histologically by an inflammatory cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrate similar to the histological appearance of pseudolymphoma.
To re-evaluate a large cohort of patients with the clinical and/or histological diagnosis or differential diagnosis of LIS and REM and to assess the evidence for infection with Borrelia.
Sixty-nine cases of LIS and 34 cases of REM were retrospectively investigated. Haematoxylin and eosin sections were re-examined, and histological diagnoses were specified and confirmed by clinicopathological correlation. Evidence for Borrelia infection was assessed by immunohistochemistry and focus-floating microscopy (FFM).
LIS appeared to serve as a collective term for two main clinicopathological reaction patterns: (i) (tumid) lupus erythematosus (LE) (32 of 69, 46%) and (ii) pseudolymphoma (31 of 69, 45%). Other diagnoses (five of 69, 7%) included polymorphic light eruption, arthropod bite reaction, spongiotic dermatitis, drug eruption and urticaria. Spirochaetes were detected by FFM in 24 of 31 (77%) cases with a pseudolymphomatous reaction, while all nonpseudolymphomatous reactions were negative. Of the cases initially considered as REM, 21 of 34 (62%) were classified as LE, four of 34 (12%) as pseudolymphoma (three of four positive for Borrelia), and five of 34 (15%) as other diagnoses (folliculitis, morphoea, seborrhoeic dermatitis, prurigo and arthropod bite reaction). The diagnosis of Borrelia-associated pseudolymphoma was made significantly more often in those cases where LIS was considered as initial differential diagnosis than REM (P < 0.05).
LIS and REM seem to represent clinicopathological reaction patterns. Our results confirm that, after accurate clinicopathological correlation, most cases of both conditions constitute hidden variants of LE. Furthermore, LIS, in contrast to REM, frequently comprises pseudolymphomatous reactions including borrelial lymphocytoma.
皮肤淋巴细胞浸润(LIS)和网状红斑黏液水肿(REM)在组织学上的特点是炎症性皮肤淋巴细胞浸润,类似于假性淋巴瘤的组织学表现。
重新评估一组具有 LIS 和 REM 的临床和/或组织学诊断或鉴别诊断的患者,并评估感染伯氏疏螺旋体的证据。
回顾性研究 69 例 LIS 和 34 例 REM。重新检查苏木精和伊红切片,并通过临床病理相关性指定和确认组织学诊断。通过免疫组织化学和焦点浮动显微镜(FFM)评估伯氏疏螺旋体感染的证据。
LIS 似乎是两种主要临床病理反应模式的集合术语:(i)(肿胀)红斑狼疮(LE)(32/69,46%)和(ii)假性淋巴瘤(31/69,45%)。其他诊断(69/69,5%)包括多形性光疹、节肢动物叮咬反应、海绵状皮炎、药物疹和荨麻疹。FFM 检测到 31 例具有假性淋巴瘤反应的病例中有 24 例(77%)存在螺旋体,而所有非假性淋巴瘤反应均为阴性。最初被认为是 REM 的病例中,21/34(62%)被归类为 LE,4/34(12%)为假性淋巴瘤(其中 4 例为伯氏疏螺旋体阳性),5/34(15%)为其他诊断(滤泡炎、硬皮病、脂溢性皮炎、瘙痒症和节肢动物叮咬反应)。当 LIS 被认为是初始鉴别诊断时,与 REM 相比,伯氏疏螺旋体相关假性淋巴瘤的诊断更为常见(P < 0.05)。
LIS 和 REM 似乎代表了临床病理反应模式。我们的结果证实,在进行准确的临床病理相关性后,大多数情况下这两种情况都构成了 LE 的隐性变异。此外,与 REM 相比,LIS 通常包含包括伯氏疏螺旋体淋巴瘤在内的假性淋巴瘤反应。