Lewis P A, Miall R C
School of Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1897-905. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0020.
The principle that the standard deviation of estimates scales with the mean estimate, commonly known as the scalar property, is one of the most broadly accepted fundamentals of interval timing. This property is measured using the coefficient of variation (CV) calculated as the ratio between the standard deviation and the mean. In 1997, John Gibbon suggested that different time measurement mechanisms may have different levels of absolute precision, and would therefore be associated with different CVs. Here, we test this proposal by examining the CVs produced by human subjects timing a broad range of intervals (68 ms to 16.7 min). Our data reveal no evidence for multiple mechanisms, but instead show a continuous logarithmic decrease in CV as timed intervals increase. This finding joins other recent reports in demonstrating a systematic violation of the scalar property in timing data. Interestingly, the estimated CV of circadian judgements fits onto the regression of decreasing CV, suggesting a link between short interval and circadian timing mechanisms.
估计值的标准差随平均估计值变化的原则,通常称为标量属性,是时间间隔计时中最广泛接受的基本原理之一。该属性通过变异系数(CV)来衡量,变异系数的计算方法是标准差与平均值之比。1997年,约翰·吉本提出不同的时间测量机制可能具有不同水平的绝对精度,因此会与不同的变异系数相关联。在此,我们通过检查人类受试者对广泛时间间隔(68毫秒至16.7分钟)计时所产生的变异系数来检验这一假设。我们的数据没有显示出存在多种机制的证据,而是表明随着计时时间间隔的增加,变异系数呈连续对数下降。这一发现与其他近期报告一起,证明了计时数据中对标量属性的系统性违反。有趣的是,昼夜节律判断的估计变异系数符合变异系数下降的回归曲线,表明短时间间隔和昼夜节律计时机制之间存在联系。