Beckett Jeffrey M, Hartley Thomas F, Ball Madeleine J
School of Human Life Sciences, Locked Bag 1320, University of Tasmania, Launceston TAS 7250, Australia.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Jul;46(Pt 4):322-6. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.008253. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
Analysis of copper and zinc in serum is commonly performed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS); however, these methods are often not readily available in smaller laboratories. Randox colorimetric assays for copper and zinc in serum were evaluated on the Thermo Electron Data Pro analyser against flame AAS methods.
Copper and zinc were measured in 48 serum samples using the Randox colorimetric copper (CU2340) and zinc (ZN2341) assays on the Data Pro analyser and the results compared with those from a Varian Spectra 880 atomic absorption spectrometer. A smaller set of samples (n = 15) were also analysed colorimetrically for zinc on the Roche Cobas Mira.
Linear regression analyses of Bland and Altman plots from the Data Pro - AAS comparison gave the following results for copper: correlation r = 0.6669 (P < 0.01), slope = -0.2499 (P < 0.01), intercept = 3.219 (P < 0.01). For zinc, results were as follows: correlation r = 0.1976, slope = 0.1807, intercept = -1.922. For the smaller set of samples, the Cobas Mira - AAS comparison for zinc gave correlation r = 0.4379, slope = 0.5294, intercept = -4.074. The results indicated significant systematic and fixed bias between the colorimetric copper and the AAS method.
Performances in comparison to AAS methods indicated the colorimetric methods, as used, are unsuitable for the accurate determination of copper and zinc in human serum.
血清中铜和锌的分析通常采用原子吸收光谱法(AAS);然而,这些方法在较小的实验室中往往不易获得。在热电电子数据分析仪上,对朗道血清铜和锌比色法与火焰原子吸收光谱法进行了评估。
使用数据分析仪上的朗道比色法铜(CU2340)和锌(ZN2341)检测法,对48份血清样本中的铜和锌进行检测,并将结果与瓦里安Spectra 880原子吸收光谱仪的检测结果进行比较。还在罗氏Cobas Mira上对比色法分析了一组较小的样本(n = 15)中的锌。
数据分析仪 - 原子吸收光谱仪比较的布兰德和奥特曼图的线性回归分析得出铜的以下结果:相关性r = 0.6669(P < 0.01),斜率 = -0.2499(P < 0.01),截距 = 3.219(P < 0.01)。对于锌,结果如下:相关性r = 0.1976,斜率 = 0.1807,截距 = -1.922。对于较小的样本组,Cobas Mira - 原子吸收光谱仪对锌的比较得出相关性r = 0.4379,斜率 = 0.5294,截距 = -4.074。结果表明比色法铜与原子吸收光谱法之间存在显著的系统偏差和固定偏差。
与原子吸收光谱法相比的性能表明,所使用的比色法不适用于准确测定人血清中的铜和锌。