• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内心的平静和目标感是癌症患儿家长的核心生存问题。

Peace of mind and sense of purpose as core existential issues among parents of children with cancer.

作者信息

Mack Jennifer W, Wolfe Joanne, Cook E Francis, Grier Holcombe E, Cleary Paul D, Weeks Jane C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):519-24. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.57.

DOI:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.57
PMID:19487607
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate issues experienced by parents of children with cancer and factors related to parents' ability to find peace of mind.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-four parents of children with cancer (response rate, 70%) in the first year of cancer treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being sense of meaning subscale.

RESULTS

Principal components analysis of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being sense of meaning subscale responses identified 2 distinct constructs, peace of mind (Cronbach alpha = .83) and sense of purpose (Cronbach alpha = .71). Scores ranged from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the strongest sense of peace or purpose. One hundred forty-seven of 181 parents (81%) scored 4 or higher for questions related to sense of purpose (mean [SD] score, 4.4 [0.6]). Only 44 of 185 parents (24%) had scores in the same range for peace of mind (mean [SD] score, 3.2 [0.9]) (P < .001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, parents had higher peace of mind scores when they also reported that they trusted the oncologist's judgment (odds ratio [OR] = 6.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-30.02), that the oncologist had disclosed detailed prognostic information (OR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.14-3.70), and that the oncologist had provided high-quality information about the cancer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.11-5.79). Peace of mind was not associated with prognosis (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.32) or time since diagnosis (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.995-1.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians may be able to facilitate formulation of peace of mind by giving parents high-quality medical information, including prognostic information, and facilitating parents' trust.

摘要

目的

评估癌症患儿家长所经历的问题以及与家长获得内心安宁能力相关的因素。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

马萨诸塞州波士顿的达纳-法伯癌症研究所和儿童医院。

参与者

194名癌症患儿的家长(回复率70%),均处于癌症治疗的第一年。

主要观察指标

慢性病治疗功能评估-精神幸福感意义子量表。

结果

对慢性病治疗功能评估-精神幸福感意义子量表的回复进行主成分分析,确定了2个不同的结构,即内心安宁(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.83)和目标感(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.71)。分数范围为1至5分,5分代表最强的安宁感或目标感。181名家长中有147名(81%)在与目标感相关的问题上得分4分或更高(平均[标准差]得分,4.4[0.6])。185名家长中只有44名(24%)在内心安宁方面的得分处于同一范围(平均[标准差]得分,3.2[0.9])(P < 0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,当家长报告他们信任肿瘤学家的判断(比值比[OR] = 6.65;95%置信区间[CI],1.47 - 30.02)、肿瘤学家已披露详细的预后信息(OR = 2.05;95% CI,1.14 - 3.70)以及肿瘤学家已提供有关癌症的高质量信息(OR = 2.54;95% CI,1.11 - 5.79)时,他们的内心安宁得分更高。内心安宁与预后(OR = 0.74;95% CI,0.41 - 1.32)或确诊后的时间(OR = 1.00;95% CI,0.995 - 1.003)无关。

结论

医生或许能够通过向家长提供包括预后信息在内的高质量医疗信息并增进家长的信任,来促进家长内心安宁的形成。

相似文献

1
Peace of mind and sense of purpose as core existential issues among parents of children with cancer.内心的平静和目标感是癌症患儿家长的核心生存问题。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):519-24. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.57.
2
Understanding of prognosis among parents of children with cancer: parental optimism and the parent-physician interaction.癌症患儿家长对预后的理解:家长的乐观态度及医患互动
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1357-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.3170.
3
Communication about prognosis between parents and physicians of children with cancer: parent preferences and the impact of prognostic information.癌症患儿家长与医生之间关于预后的沟通:家长的偏好及预后信息的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 20;24(33):5265-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5326.
4
Hope and prognostic disclosure.希望与预后告知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10;25(35):5636-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6110.
5
A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp.FACIT-Sp的三因素模型。
Psychooncology. 2008 Sep;17(9):908-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1307.
6
Parent and physician perspectives on quality of care at the end of life in children with cancer.父母与医生对癌症患儿临终关怀质量的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9155-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.010. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
7
Spirituality as a core domain in the assessment of quality of life in oncology.灵性作为肿瘤学中生活质量评估的一个核心领域。
Psychooncology. 2008 Nov;17(11):1121-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.1322.
8
Parental optimism in poor prognosis pediatric cancers.父母对预后不良的儿童癌症的乐观态度。
Psychooncology. 2009 Jul;18(7):783-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.1490.
9
Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer.癌症患儿生命末期的症状与痛苦
N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):326-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002033420506.
10
Parent perceptions of the quality of information received about a child's cancer.家长对儿童癌症相关信息质量的感知。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Nov;60(11):1896-901. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24652. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrinsic resting-state connectivity and personal meaning across the transition to fatherhood.为人父过程中的内在静息态连接性与个人意义。
Emotion. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1037/emo0001574.
2
Peds OncoTalk: A Curriculum to Teach Communication Skills to Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Fellows.《儿科肿瘤学对话:面向儿科血液学/肿瘤学住院医师的沟通技能培训课程》
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Jul 21:e31912. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31912.
3
Preferences for Communication About Prognosis Among Children With Cancer, Parents, and Oncologists.癌症患儿、家长及肿瘤学家对预后沟通的偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5431.
4
Functions of patient- and family-centered pediatric cancer communication in Pakistan.巴基斯坦以患者和家庭为中心的儿科癌症沟通的作用。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 11;14:1393908. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1393908. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient, Parent, and Oncologist Perspectives and Recommendations on the Right Way to Talk About Prognosis in Advanced Childhood Cancer.患者、家长及肿瘤学家关于儿童晚期癌症预后正确沟通方式的观点与建议
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Apr;21(4):552-560. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00249. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
6
Advance Care Planning for Children With Rare Diseases: A Pilot RCT.罕见病儿童的预先医疗照护计划:一项先导性 RCT 研究。
Pediatrics. 2024 Jun 1;153(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-064557.
7
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Core Components of Therapeutic Alliance for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.患者、照料者和临床医生对晚期癌症青少年和年轻成人治疗联盟核心要素的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28153.
8
The Day One Talk, 20 Years Later: What Have We Learned?二十年后的首日演讲:我们学到了什么?
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Apr;19(4):164-166. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
9
Oncologist approaches to communicating uncertain disease status in pediatric cancer: a qualitative study.肿瘤学家在儿童癌症中沟通不确定疾病状态的方法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10190-6.
10
A Descriptive and Phenomenological Exploration of the Spiritual Needs of Chinese Children Hospitalized with Cancer.中文标题:癌症住院儿童精神需求的描述性和现象学探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013217.