Heise Tim, Heinemann Lutz, Hövelmann Ulrike, Brauns Bianca, Nosek Leszek, Haahr Hanne L, Olsen Klaus J
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Neuss, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1431-3. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0097. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
OBJECTIVE Pharmacological profiles of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) once daily (OD), twice daily (b.i.d.), and three times daily (t.i.d.) were compared with other insulin regimens in two crossover glucose clamp studies of insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS Study 1 consisted of BIAsp 30 OD, b.i.d., and t.i.d. versus biphasic human insulin 30/70 (BHI 30), OD (n = 24). Study 2 examined BIAsp 30 t.i.d. versus basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine OD plus insulin glulisine t.i.d.) (n = 24). Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) were investigated over 24 h. RESULTS Study 1: PK and PD were markedly different between BIAsp 30 OD and BHI 30 OD: the maximum insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate (GIR) were higher for BIAsp 30; time to maximum metabolism was 1.7 h sooner for BIAsp 30. Study 2: both regimens showed three distinct prandial-related GIR peaks. GIR 24-h area under the curve for BIAsp t.i.d. was higher than for basal-bolus therapy: 2,585.2 vs. 2,289.2 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS BIAsp had pharmacological advantages over BHI. BIAsp t.i.d. had a similar PD profile to basal-bolus therapy.
在两项胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的交叉葡萄糖钳夹研究中,比较一日一次(OD)、一日两次(b.i.d.)和一日三次(t.i.d.)的双相门冬胰岛素30/70(BIAsp 30)与其他胰岛素治疗方案的药理学特征。研究设计与方法:研究1包括BIAsp 30 OD、b.i.d.和t.i.d.与双相人胰岛素30/70(BHI 30)OD的比较(n = 24)。研究2检测BIAsp 30 t.i.d.与基础-餐时疗法(甘精胰岛素OD加赖脯胰岛素t.i.d.)的比较(n = 24)。在24小时内研究药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)。结果:研究1:BIAsp 30 OD和BHI 30 OD之间的PK和PD有显著差异:BIAsp 30的最大胰岛素浓度和葡萄糖输注速率(GIR)更高;BIAsp 30达到最大代谢的时间早1.7小时。研究2:两种治疗方案均显示出三个与餐时相关的明显GIR峰值。BIAsp t.i.d.的24小时GIR曲线下面积高于基础-餐时疗法:分别为2585.2和2289.2 mg/kg。结论:BIAsp比BHI具有药理学优势。BIAsp t.i.d.与基础-餐时疗法具有相似的PD特征。