Cook Nancy R, Ridker Paul M
Donald W. Reynolds Center for Cardiovascular Research and the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 2;150(11):795-802. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00007.
Models for risk prediction are widely used in clinical practice to stratify risk and assign treatment strategies. The contribution of new biomarkers has largely been based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, but this measure can be insensitive to important changes in absolute risk. Methods based on risk stratification have recently been proposed to compare predictive models. Such methods include the reclassification calibration statistic, the net reclassification improvement, and the integrated discrimination improvement. This article demonstrates the use of reclassification measures and illustrates their performance for well-known cardiovascular risk predictors in a cohort of women. These measures are targeted at evaluating the potential of new models and markers to change risk strata and alter treatment decisions.
风险预测模型在临床实践中被广泛用于对风险进行分层并制定治疗策略。新生物标志物的作用很大程度上基于受试者工作特征曲线下面积,但该指标可能对绝对风险的重要变化不敏感。最近有人提出基于风险分层的方法来比较预测模型。这些方法包括重新分类校准统计量、净重新分类改善和综合鉴别改善。本文展示了重新分类措施的应用,并说明了它们在一组女性中对著名心血管风险预测指标的表现。这些措施旨在评估新模型和标志物改变风险分层及治疗决策的潜力。