Suppr超能文献

音频、视觉和触觉刺激组合中的感觉优势。

Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

作者信息

Hecht David, Reiner Miriam

机构信息

The Touch Laboratory, Gutwirth Building, Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;193(2):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1626-z. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

Abstract

Participants presented with auditory, visual, or bi-sensory audio-visual stimuli in a speeded discrimination task, fail to respond to the auditory component of the bi-sensory trials significantly more often than they fail to respond to the visual component--a 'visual dominance' effect. The current study investigated further the sensory dominance phenomenon in all combinations of auditory, visual and haptic stimuli. We found a similar visual dominance effect also in bi-sensory trials of combined haptic-visual stimuli, but no bias towards either sensory modality in bi-sensory trials of haptic-auditory stimuli. When presented with tri-sensory trials of combined auditory-visual-haptic stimuli, participants made more errors of responding only to two corresponding sensory signals than errors of responding only to a single sensory modality, however, there were no biases towards either sensory modality (or sensory pairs) in the distribution of both types of errors (i.e. responding only to a single stimulus or to pairs of stimuli). These results suggest that while vision can dominate both the auditory and the haptic sensory modalities, it is limited to bi-sensory combinations in which the visual signal is combined with another single stimulus. However, in a tri-sensory combination when a visual signal is presented simultaneously with both the auditory and the haptic signals, the probability of missing two signals is much smaller than of missing only one signal and therefore the visual dominance disappears.

摘要

在一项快速辨别任务中,参与者面对听觉、视觉或双感官视听刺激时,未能对双感官试验中的听觉成分做出反应的情况比未能对视觉成分做出反应的情况明显更频繁——这是一种“视觉优势”效应。当前的研究进一步调查了听觉、视觉和触觉刺激的所有组合中的感官优势现象。我们发现在触觉 - 视觉刺激的双感官试验中也存在类似的视觉优势效应,但在触觉 - 听觉刺激的双感官试验中对任何一种感官模式都没有偏向。当面对听觉 - 视觉 - 触觉刺激的三感官试验时,参与者仅对两个相应感官信号做出反应的错误比仅对单一感官模式做出反应的错误更多,然而,在这两种错误类型(即仅对单个刺激或对刺激对做出反应)的分布中,对任何一种感官模式(或感官对)都没有偏向。这些结果表明,虽然视觉可以在听觉和触觉感官模式中占据主导地位,但它仅限于视觉信号与另一个单一刺激组合的双感官组合。然而,在视觉信号与听觉和触觉信号同时呈现的三感官组合中,错过两个信号的概率远小于错过仅一个信号的概率,因此视觉优势消失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验