Suppr超能文献

围刺疗法治疗急性痛风性关节炎的疗效观察

[Observation on therapeutic effect of surrounded needling therapy on acute gouty arthritis].

作者信息

Xie Xin-qun, Cao Yao-xing, Li Feng, Meng Yu, Deng Lu

机构信息

Department of Acupuncture, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi High Training School of TCM, Fuzhou 344000, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 May;29(5):375-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical therapeutic effect of surrounded needling therapy and medication on acute gouty arthritis.

METHODS

Sixty cases of acute gouty arthritis were randomly divided into a surrounded needling therapy group and a western medicine group, 30 cases in each group. The surrounded needling therapy group was treated with shallow needling on local affected area as main and 4-5 distant acupoints as adjuvant, once each day; the western medicine group was treated with oral administration of Indomethacin and Allopurinol, thrice each day. They were treated for 15 days. The clinical therapeutic effects, the changes of serum uric acid content and the adverse reaction were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

The total effective rate was 93.3% in the surrounded needling therapy group and 80.0% in the western medicine group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01); the serum uric acid contents before and after treatment were (516.85 +/- 48.63) micromol/L and (293.77 +/- 68.45) micromol/L in the surrounded needling therapy group, and (509.66 +/- 51.11) micromol/L and (333.66 +/- 89.22) mciromol/L in the western medicine group, respectively, with significant differences before and after treatment in the two groups (both P < 0.05), and with a significant difference in the serum uric acid content after treatment between the two groups (P < 0.01). The surrounded needling therapy group had no adverse reaction, and the adverse reaction rate of the western medicine group was 46.7%, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Surrounded needling therapy is superior to the western medicine in the therapeutic effect on acute gouty arthritis, and it is a safe and effective method for acute gouty arthritis.

摘要

目的

比较围刺疗法与药物治疗急性痛风性关节炎的临床疗效。

方法

将60例急性痛风性关节炎患者随机分为围刺疗法组和西药组,每组30例。围刺疗法组以局部患处以浅刺为主,配合4~5个远端穴位,每日1次;西药组口服吲哚美辛和别嘌醇,每日3次。两组均治疗15天。观察两组的临床疗效、血清尿酸含量变化及不良反应。

结果

围刺疗法组总有效率为93.3%,西药组为80.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);围刺疗法组治疗前后血清尿酸含量分别为(516.85±48.63)μmol/L和(293.77±68.45)μmol/L,西药组分别为(509.66±51.11)μmol/L和(333.66±89.22)μmol/L,两组治疗前后比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),且两组治疗后血清尿酸含量比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。围刺疗法组无不良反应,西药组不良反应发生率为46.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

围刺疗法治疗急性痛风性关节炎的疗效优于西药,是治疗急性痛风性关节炎的一种安全有效的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验