Sligl Wendy I, Milner Danny A, Sundar Sugantha, Mphatswe Wendy, Majumdar Sumit R
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):93-101. doi: 10.1086/599343.
Septic shock is common and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids is common, but definitive data are lacking. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy among patients with septic shock.
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized trials and observational studies published from January 1993 through December 2008. Studies were selected if they included adults with septic shock, discussed treatment with intravenous corticosteroids, and reported at least 1 outcome of interest (e.g., mortality, shock reversal, or incidence of superinfection). Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility, assessed methodologic quality, and abstracted data.
Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for 28-day all-cause mortality, shock reversal at 7 days, and incidence of superinfection with use of random-effects models. Analyses, stratified by adrenal responsiveness, were prespecified. Eight studies (6 randomized trials) involving a total of 1876 patients were selected. Overall, corticosteroid therapy did not result in a statistically significant difference in mortality (42.2% [369 of 875 patients] vs. 38.4% [384 of 1001]; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.18). A statistically significant difference in the incidence of shock reversal at 7 days was observed between patients who received corticosteroids and those who did not (64.9% [314 of 484 patients] vs. 47.5% [228 of 480]; RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.64), with similar point estimates for both corticotropin stimulation test responders and nonresponders. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of superinfection between patients treated with corticosteroids and patients not treated with corticosteroids (25.3% [114 of 450 patients] vs. 22.7% [100 of 441]; RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.42).
In patients with septic shock, corticosteroid therapy appears to be safe but does not reduce 28-day all-cause mortality rates. It does, however, significantly reduce the incidence of vasopressor-dependent shock, which may be a clinically worthwhile goal.
感染性休克很常见,会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。使用皮质类固醇进行辅助治疗很普遍,但缺乏确凿的数据。我们旨在确定皮质类固醇治疗在感染性休克患者中的疗效和安全性。
检索了Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和谷歌学术,查找1993年1月至2008年12月发表的随机试验和观察性研究。如果研究纳入了感染性休克的成年人,讨论了静脉注射皮质类固醇的治疗,并报告了至少1项感兴趣的结果(如死亡率、休克逆转或二重感染发生率),则选择这些研究。两名评审员独立确定入选资格、评估方法学质量并提取数据。
使用随机效应模型估计了28天全因死亡率、7天休克逆转和二重感染发生率的合并相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。预先设定了按肾上腺反应性分层的分析。选择了8项研究(6项随机试验),共涉及1876名患者。总体而言,皮质类固醇治疗在死亡率方面没有统计学上的显著差异(42.2%[875例患者中的369例]对38.4%[1001例患者中的384例];RR,1.00;95%CI,0.84-1.18)。接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者与未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者在7天休克逆转发生率上存在统计学上的显著差异(64.9%[484例患者中的314例]对47.5%[480例患者中的228例];RR,1.41;95%CI,1.22-1.64),促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验反应者和无反应者的点估计相似。接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者与未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者在二重感染发生率上没有统计学上的显著差异(25.3%[450例患者中的114例]对22.7%[441例患者中的100例];RR,1.11;95%CI,0.86-1.42)。
在感染性休克患者中,皮质类固醇治疗似乎是安全的,但并不能降低28天全因死亡率。然而,它确实显著降低了血管升压药依赖型休克的发生率,这可能是一个临床上值得追求的目标。