University of Rochester Medical Center, , Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Lung Cancer. 2010 Mar;67(3):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined zoledronic acid and docetaxel/carboplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as preclinical studies showed synergistic antitumoral activity with bisphosphonates and docetaxel. Patients with inoperable stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC were randomized 2:1 to receive docetaxel 75mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration time curve 6 with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) zoledronic acid 4mg every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients responding in Arm A were rerandomized to receive monthly zoledronic acid (maximum: 12 months [Arm A1] or no zoledronic acid [Arm A2]). Patients responding in Arm B entered Arm B1 for follow-up evaluation only. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without disease progression; secondary endpoints were time to disease progression (TTP), TTP in bone, best overall response rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) time, and safety; study not powered to detect endpoint differences. Of 150 patients, 98 were randomized to Arm A and 52 to Arm B. In the treatment phase, results were similar between groups in the proportion of patients without disease progression (40.9% vs 38.8%; P=.8096) and median TTP (132d vs 132d; P=.9622). One-year OS times and best overall response rates were 266d vs 206d (P=.4855) and 64.1% vs 72% (P=.3423), respectively; the study was not powered to detect differences. In the follow-up phase, TTP and OS time were similar. Adding zoledronic acid to docetaxel/carboplatin in advanced stage NSCLC patients was well tolerated, but provided little to no effect on disease progression endpoints.
这项研究旨在评估唑来膦酸联合多西他赛/卡铂治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性,因为临床前研究表明双膦酸盐与多西他赛联合具有协同抗肿瘤活性。不可切除的 IIIB 期或 IV 期 NSCLC 患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配接受多西他赛 75mg/m(2)和卡铂 AUC 6(A 组)或不接受唑来膦酸 4mg(B 组),每 3 周给药 6 个周期。A 组中应答的患者重新随机接受唑来膦酸(最大剂量:12 个月[ A1 组]或不接受唑来膦酸[ A2 组])。B 组中应答的患者仅进入 B1 组进行随访评估。主要终点是无疾病进展患者的比例;次要终点是疾病进展时间(TTP)、骨转移 TTP、最佳总体缓解率、1 年总生存率(OS)时间和安全性;研究未设效能检测终点差异。150 例患者中,98 例随机分配至 A 组,52 例随机分配至 B 组。在治疗阶段,两组间无疾病进展患者的比例(40.9% vs 38.8%;P=.8096)和中位 TTP(132d vs 132d;P=.9622)相似。1 年 OS 时间和最佳总体缓解率分别为 266d vs 206d(P=.4855)和 64.1% vs 72%(P=.3423);研究未设效能检测差异。在随访阶段,TTP 和 OS 时间相似。在晚期 NSCLC 患者中,唑来膦酸联合多西他赛/卡铂治疗耐受性良好,但对疾病进展终点无显著影响。