Rhudy Jamie L, France Christopher R, Bartley Emily J, McCabe Klanci M, Williams Amy E
Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2009 Sep;46(5):939-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00835.x. Epub 2009 May 22.
Physiological reactions to noxious stimuli are often used to make inferences about pain, but few studies have thoroughly examined the intra- and interindividual relationships between them. In the present study (N=104), multilevel analyses was used to assess relations between physiological (nociceptive flexion reflex magnitude [NFR], blink reflex magnitude, skin conductance response [SCR], heart rate [HR]) and subjective reactions to electrocutaneous stimuli. All physiological reactions were significant predictors of ratings when entered alone, explaining 1% (SCR) to 29% (NFR) of the variance; but only NFR, blink, and HR were significant in a multivariate predictor model. Significant interindividual variability in slopes was found for blink and HR, but not NFR. A final trimmed model that included NFR, blink, and the blink random slope explained 35% of the variance in ratings.
对有害刺激的生理反应常被用于推断疼痛情况,但很少有研究全面考察它们在个体内和个体间的关系。在本研究(N = 104)中,采用多水平分析来评估生理指标(伤害性屈曲反射幅度[NFR]、眨眼反射幅度、皮肤电导反应[SCR]、心率[HR])与对电皮肤刺激的主观反应之间的关系。所有生理反应单独纳入时都是评分的显著预测指标,可解释1%(SCR)至29%(NFR)的方差变异;但在多变量预测模型中,只有NFR、眨眼和心率具有显著性。眨眼和心率的斜率存在显著的个体间差异,但NFR不存在。最终的精简模型纳入了NFR、眨眼以及眨眼随机斜率,可解释评分中35%的方差变异。