Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care, Université Laval, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.
Implement Sci. 2009 Jun 4;4:30. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-30.
Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. However, little is known about patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) in CPGs development and implementation. This study aims at identifying what it is about PPIP that works, in which contexts are PPIP most likely to be effective, and how are PPIP assumed to lead to better CPGs development and implementation.
A knowledge synthesis will be conducted in four phases. In phase one, literature on PPIP in CPGs development will be searched through bibliographic databases. A call for bibliographic references and unpublished reports will also be sent via the mailing lists of relevant organizations. Eligible publications will include original qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods study designs reporting on a PPIP pertaining to CPGs development or implementation. They will also include documents produced by CPGs organizations to describe their PPIP. In phase two, grounded in the program's logic model, two independent reviewers will extract data to collect information on the principal components and activities of PPIP, the resources needed, the contexts in which PPIP were developed and tested, and the assumptions underlying PPIP. Quality assessment will be made for all retained publications. Our literature search will be complemented with interviews of key informants drawn from of a purposive sample of CPGs developers and patient/public representatives. In phase three, we will synthesize evidence from both the publications and interviews data using template content analysis to organize the identified components in a meaningful framework of PPIP theories. During a face-to-face workshop, findings will be validated with different stakeholder and a final toolkit for CPGs developers will be refined.
The proposed research project will be among the first to explore the PPIP in CPGs development and implementation based on a wide range of publications and key informants interviews. It is anticipated that the results generated by the proposed study will significantly contribute to the improvement of the reconciliation of CPGs with patient preferences and values as well as with social norms.
未能协调患者的偏好、价值观和社会规范与临床实践指南(CPGs)的建议,可能会阻碍 CPG 在临床实践中的实施。然而,对于患者和公众参与计划(PPIP)在 CPG 制定和实施中的作用,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在确定 PPIP 的作用、在哪些情况下 PPIP 最有可能有效,以及 PPIP 如何被认为能够促进更好的 CPG 制定和实施。
将分四个阶段进行知识综合。在第一阶段,将通过文献数据库搜索有关 CPG 制定中 PPIP 的文献。还将通过相关组织的邮件列表发送对文献参考和未发表报告的征集。合格的出版物将包括与 CPG 制定或实施相关的、针对 PPIP 的原始定性、定量或混合方法研究设计报告。还将包括 CPG 组织编写的描述其 PPIP 的文件。在第二阶段,根据该计划的逻辑模型,两名独立的审查员将提取数据,以收集有关 PPIP 的主要组成部分和活动、所需资源、开发和测试 PPIP 的背景以及 PPIP 所依据的假设的信息。将对所有保留的出版物进行质量评估。我们的文献检索将辅以对 CPG 制定者和患者/公众代表的有针对性抽样的关键信息提供者的访谈。在第三阶段,我们将使用模板内容分析综合出版物和访谈数据中的证据,将已识别的组成部分组织到一个有意义的 PPIP 理论框架中。在面对面的研讨会上,将与不同利益相关者验证研究结果,并完善最终的 CPG 制定者工具包。
拟议的研究项目将是第一个基于广泛的出版物和关键信息提供者访谈,探索 CPG 制定和实施中的 PPIP 的研究之一。预计拟议研究产生的结果将极大地促进 CPG 与患者偏好、价值观和社会规范的协调。