Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2010 Feb;121(1-2):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Scientific evidence for a male-typed depression ("male depression") is still limited, but mainly supports this concept with respect to single externalizing symptoms or symptom clusters. In particular, studies on non-clinical populations including males and females are lacking. The present study aims at assessing general well-being, the risk and the symptoms of male depression dependent on biological sex and gender-role orientation on instrumental (masculine) and expressive (feminine) personality traits in an unselected community sample of males and females.
Students (518 males, 500 females) of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany, were asked to participate in a "stress study" and complete the following self-report questionnaires: the WHO-5 Well-being Index [Bech, P., 1998. Quality of Life in the Psychiatric Patient. Mosby-Wolfe, London], the Gotland Scale for Male Depression [Walinder, J., Rutz, W., 2001. Male depression and suicide. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 16 (suppl 2), 21-24] and the German Extended Personal Attribute Questionnaire [Runge, T.E., Frey, D., Gollwitzer, P.M., et al., 1981. Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits. A comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12, 142-162].
General well-being of the students was significantly lower compared to population norms. Contrary to expectations, female students had a greater risk of male depression than male students (28.9% vs. 22.4%; p<0.05). Overall, prototypic depressive symptoms as well as externalizing symptoms were more pronounced in females. In the subgroup of those at risk for male depression, biological sex and kind of symptoms were unrelated. Principal component analyses revealed a similar symptom structure for males and females. Low scores on masculinity/instrumentality significantly predicted higher risk of male depression, independent of biological sex.
The study sample is not representative to the general population. Self-reports of the participants were not validated by a clinical evaluation.
The results suggest that male depression might also be highly prevalent in females, at least in university students. This can be explained by a growing social acceptance of aggression in women, by a greater exposure to chronic stressors and by a more pronounced stress sensitivity. Particularly female students need special attention and support. Externalizing symptoms should be routinely assessed when diagnosing depression in men and women.
科学证据表明存在男性型抑郁症(“男性抑郁症”),但主要是基于单一的外化症状或症状群来支持这一概念。特别是,缺乏针对包括男性和女性在内的非临床人群的研究。本研究旨在评估在未选择的男性和女性社区样本中,生物性别和性别角色取向对工具性(男性化)和表达性(女性化)人格特质的男性抑郁的一般幸福感、风险和症状的影响。
德国慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学的学生(518 名男性,500 名女性)被要求参加一项“压力研究”,并完成以下自我报告问卷:世界卫生组织 5 项幸福感指数[Bech,P.,1998. 精神病患者的生活质量。Mosby-Wolfe,London]、哥特兰男性抑郁量表[Walinder,J.,Rutz,W.,2001. 男性抑郁和自杀。国际临床精神药理学 16(增刊 2),21-24]和德国扩展个人属性问卷[Runge,T.E.,Frey,D.,Gollwitzer,P.M.,等,1981. 男性(工具性)和女性(表达性)特质。美国和德国学生的比较。跨文化心理学杂志 12,142-162]。
与人口常模相比,学生的一般幸福感明显较低。出乎意料的是,女学生患男性抑郁症的风险高于男学生(28.9%对 22.4%;p<0.05)。总体而言,典型的抑郁症状以及外化症状在女性中更为明显。在有男性抑郁症风险的亚组中,生物性别和症状类型没有关系。主成分分析显示男性和女性的症状结构相似。男性气概/工具性得分低显著预测男性抑郁症风险增加,与生物性别无关。
研究样本不具有代表性,不能代表总体人群。参与者的自我报告未经临床评估验证。
研究结果表明,男性抑郁症在女性中也可能非常普遍,至少在大学生中是如此。这可以用攻击性在女性中越来越被社会接受、慢性应激源暴露增加以及应激敏感性增强来解释。特别是女学生需要特别关注和支持。在诊断男性和女性抑郁症时,应常规评估外化症状。