• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于亲属关系对阿米蒂奇趋势检验进行的修正,以解决隐藏的群体结构和微小的差异基因分型错误。

A kinship-based modification of the armitage trend test to address hidden population structure and small differential genotyping errors.

作者信息

Rakovski Cyril S, Stram Daniel O

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Chapman University, Orange, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2009 Jun 8;4(6):e5825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005825.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0005825
PMID:19503792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2688076/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We propose a modification of the well-known Armitage trend test to address the problems associated with hidden population structure and hidden relatedness in genome-wide case-control association studies.

METHODS

The new test adopts beneficial traits from three existing testing strategies: the principal components, mixed model, and genomic control while avoiding some of their disadvantageous characteristics, such as the tendency of the principal components method to over-correct in certain situations or the failure of the genomic control approach to reorder the adjusted tests based on their degree of alignment with the underlying hidden structure. The new procedure is based on Gauss-Markov estimators derived from a straightforward linear model with an imposed variance structure proportional to an empirical relatedness matrix. Lastly, conceptual and analytical similarities to and distinctions from other approaches are emphasized throughout.

RESULTS

Our simulations show that the power performance of the proposed test is quite promising compared to the considered competing strategies. The power gains are especially large when small differential differences between cases and controls are present; a likely scenario when public controls are used in multiple studies.

CONCLUSION

The proposed modified approach attains high power more consistently than that of the existing commonly implemented tests. Its performance improvement is most apparent when small but detectable systematic differences between cases and controls exist.

摘要

背景/目的:我们提出对著名的阿米蒂奇趋势检验进行修改,以解决全基因组病例对照关联研究中与隐藏群体结构和隐藏相关性相关的问题。

方法

新检验采用了三种现有检验策略的有益特性:主成分分析、混合模型和基因组控制,同时避免了它们的一些不利特征,例如主成分分析方法在某些情况下过度校正的趋势,或者基因组控制方法无法根据与潜在隐藏结构的对齐程度对调整后的检验进行重新排序。新程序基于从一个简单线性模型导出的高斯 - 马尔可夫估计量,该线性模型具有与经验相关性矩阵成比例的强制方差结构。最后,自始至终强调了与其他方法在概念和分析上的异同。

结果

我们的模拟表明,与所考虑的竞争策略相比,所提出检验的功效表现很有前景。当病例与对照之间存在微小差异时,功效提升尤为显著;在多项研究中使用公共对照时可能会出现这种情况。

结论

所提出的改进方法比现有的常用检验更一致地获得高功效。当病例与对照之间存在微小但可检测的系统差异时,其性能提升最为明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/09c2b95f6260/pone.0005825.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/6dcde08aeee8/pone.0005825.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/8871ba4c47cc/pone.0005825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/262f679e0d2d/pone.0005825.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/09c2b95f6260/pone.0005825.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/6dcde08aeee8/pone.0005825.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/8871ba4c47cc/pone.0005825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/262f679e0d2d/pone.0005825.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c00/2688076/09c2b95f6260/pone.0005825.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A kinship-based modification of the armitage trend test to address hidden population structure and small differential genotyping errors.一种基于亲属关系对阿米蒂奇趋势检验进行的修正,以解决隐藏的群体结构和微小的差异基因分型错误。
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 8;4(6):e5825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005825.
2
A prevalence-based association test for case-control studies.一种用于病例对照研究的基于患病率的关联检验。
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;32(7):600-5. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20342.
3
On genome-wide association studies for family-based designs: an integrative analysis approach combining ascertained family samples with unselected controls.基于家系设计的全基因组关联研究:一种整合分析方法,将已确定的家系样本与未经选择的对照相结合。
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr 9;86(4):573-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
4
Genetic model selection in two-phase analysis for case-control association studies.病例对照关联研究两阶段分析中的遗传模型选择
Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):391-9. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm039. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
5
Effects of differential genotyping error rate on the type I error probability of case-control studies.差异基因分型错误率对病例对照研究I型错误概率的影响。
Hum Hered. 2006;61(1):55-64. doi: 10.1159/000092553. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
6
Markov and Semi-Markov switching of source appearances for nonstationary independent component analysis.用于非平稳独立成分分析的源信号外观的马尔可夫和半马尔可夫切换
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2007 Sep;18(5):1326-42. doi: 10.1109/tnn.2007.895829.
7
An improved score test for genetic association studies.一种改进的遗传关联研究的得分检验方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;35(5):350-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20583. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
8
Power comparison of Cochran-Armitage trend test against allelic and genotypic tests in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.在大规模病例对照遗传关联研究中,比较 Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验与等位基因和基因型检验的功效。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2657-2673. doi: 10.1177/0962280216683979. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
9
Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods.基因分型错误对I型错误率及基于单倍型的关联分析方法效能的影响。
BMC Genet. 2009 Jan 29;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-3.
10
A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies.一种在病例对照研究中用于精细定位的关联测量与哈迪-温伯格不平衡相结合的强大方法。
Stat Med. 2006 Jan 15;25(1):105-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.2350.

引用本文的文献

1
Kinship estimation bias carries over to heritability estimation bias using variance components.亲属关系估计偏差会延续到使用方差成分的遗传力估计偏差中。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 15:2025.05.13.653659. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.13.653659.
2
Genetic association models are robust to common population kinship estimation biases.遗传关联模型对常见的群体亲缘关系估计偏差具有稳健性。
Genetics. 2023 May 4;224(1). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad030.
3
Estimating FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures.估计任意群体结构的 FST 和亲缘关系。

本文引用的文献

1
Review and evaluation of methods correcting for population stratification with a focus on underlying statistical principles.针对群体分层校正方法的回顾与评估,重点关注其潜在的统计原理。
Hum Hered. 2008;66(2):67-86. doi: 10.1159/000119107. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
2
Improved correction for population stratification in genome-wide association studies by identifying hidden population structures.通过识别隐藏的群体结构改进全基因组关联研究中的群体分层校正。
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):215-26. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20296.
3
A genomic background based method for association analysis in related individuals.
PLoS Genet. 2021 Jan 19;17(1):e1009241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009241. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
The identification of 14 new genes for meat quality traits in chicken using a genome-wide association study.利用全基因组关联研究鉴定鸡肉品质性状的 14 个新基因。
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jul 8;14:458. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-458.
5
ETHNOPRED: a novel machine learning method for accurate continental and sub-continental ancestry identification and population stratification correction.ETHNOPRED:一种用于准确进行大陆和次大陆祖先鉴定和群体分层校正的新型机器学习方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Feb 22;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-61.
6
Analysis of family- and population-based samples in cohort genome-wide association studies.基于家系和人群的样本在队列全基因组关联研究中的分析。
Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;131(2):275-87. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1071-0. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
7
Effective sample size: Quick estimation of the effect of related samples in genetic case-control association analyses.有效样本量:遗传病例对照关联分析中相关样本效应的快速估计。
Comput Biol Chem. 2011 Feb;35(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
8
A comparison of association methods correcting for population stratification in case-control studies.病例对照研究中校正群体分层的关联方法比较。
Ann Hum Genet. 2011 May;75(3):418-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00639.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
9
Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.多标志物逻辑回归模型的比较及其在精神分裂症全基因组扫描中的应用。
BMC Genet. 2010 Sep 9;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-80.
10
The potential for enhancing the power of genetic association studies in African Americans through the reuse of existing genotype data.通过重复利用现有基因型数据,提高非裔美国人遗传关联研究效力的潜力。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Sep 2;6(9):e1001096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001096.
一种基于基因组背景的相关个体关联分析方法。
PLoS One. 2007 Dec 5;2(12):e1274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001274.
4
Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans.用于全基因组关联研究的基于家系的关联检验
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;81(5):913-26. doi: 10.1086/521580. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
5
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.PLINK:一个用于全基因组关联分析和基于群体的连锁分析的工具集。
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75. doi: 10.1086/519795. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
6
A method to address differential bias in genotyping in large-scale association studies.一种解决大规模关联研究中基因分型差异偏倚的方法。
PLoS Genet. 2007 May 18;3(5):e74. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030074. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
7
An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples.一个拟南芥在结构化样本中进行关联作图的例子。
PLoS Genet. 2007 Jan 19;3(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030004. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
8
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.主成分分析可校正全基因组关联研究中的分层现象。
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. Epub 2006 Jul 23.
9
A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness.一种用于关联映射的统一混合模型方法,该方法考虑了多个相关水平。
Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):203-8. doi: 10.1038/ng1702. Epub 2005 Dec 25.
10
Novel case-control test in a founder population identifies P-selectin as an atopy-susceptibility locus.在一个奠基者群体中进行的新型病例对照试验确定P选择素是一个特应性易感基因座。
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Sep;73(3):612-26. doi: 10.1086/378208. Epub 2003 Aug 15.