• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用常规住院患者数据识别有再次入院风险的患者。

Using routine inpatient data to identify patients at risk of hospital readmission.

作者信息

Howell Stuart, Coory Michael, Martin Jennifer, Duckett Stephen

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Improvement, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 9;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-96.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-9-96
PMID:19505342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2700797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A relatively small percentage of patients with chronic medical conditions account for a much larger percentage of inpatient costs. There is some evidence that case-management can improve health and quality-of-life and reduce the number of times these patients are readmitted. To assess whether a statistical algorithm, based on routine inpatient data, can be used to identify patients at risk of readmission and who would therefore benefit from case-management.

METHODS

Queensland database study of public-hospital patients, who had at least one emergency admission for a chronic medical condition (e.g., congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes or dementia) during 2005/2006. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop an algorithm to predict readmission within 12 months. The performance of the algorithm was tested against recorded readmissions using sensitivity, specificity, and Likelihood Ratios (positive and negative).

RESULTS

Several factors were identified that predicted readmission (i.e., age, co-morbidities, economic disadvantage, number of previous admissions). The discriminatory power of the model was modest as determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (c = 0.65). At a risk score threshold of 50, the algorithm identified only 44.7% (95% CI: 42.5%, 46.9%) of patients admitted with a reference condition who had an admission in the next 12 months; 37.5% (95% CI: 35.0%, 40.0%) of patients were flagged incorrectly (they did not have a subsequent admission).

CONCLUSION

A statistical algorithm based on Queensland hospital inpatient data, performed only moderately in identifying patients at risk of readmission. The main problem is that there are too many false negatives, which means that many patients who might benefit would not be offered case-management.

摘要

背景

患有慢性疾病的患者中,相对较小比例的人群却占据了住院费用的较大比例。有证据表明,病例管理可以改善健康状况和生活质量,并减少这些患者再次入院的次数。本研究旨在评估基于常规住院数据的统计算法是否可用于识别有再次入院风险的患者,这些患者可能会从病例管理中受益。

方法

对昆士兰公立医院患者进行数据库研究,这些患者在2005/2006年期间因慢性疾病(如充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、糖尿病或痴呆症)至少有一次紧急入院治疗。采用多变量逻辑回归开发一种算法,以预测12个月内的再次入院情况。使用敏感性、特异性和似然比(阳性和阴性)对算法的性能进行测试,并与记录的再次入院情况进行对比。

结果

确定了几个预测再次入院的因素(即年龄、合并症、经济劣势、既往入院次数)。根据受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积确定,该模型的鉴别能力一般(c = 0.65)。在风险评分阈值为50时,该算法仅识别出44.7%(95%置信区间:42.5%,46.9%)患有参考疾病且在接下来12个月内再次入院的患者;37.5%(95%置信区间:35.0%,40.0%)的患者被错误标记(他们没有随后的入院记录)。

结论

基于昆士兰医院住院数据的统计算法在识别有再次入院风险的患者方面表现一般。主要问题是假阴性太多,这意味着许多可能受益的患者无法获得病例管理服务。

相似文献

1
Using routine inpatient data to identify patients at risk of hospital readmission.利用常规住院患者数据识别有再次入院风险的患者。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 9;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-96.
2
Evaluating the predictive strength of the LACE index in identifying patients at high risk of hospital readmission following an inpatient episode: a retrospective cohort study.评估LACE指数在识别住院患者出院后再次入院高风险患者方面的预测强度:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016921.
3
Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients.发现有再次入院风险的患者:开发识别高危患者的算法
BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.657917.AE. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
4
Factors associated with 30-day and 1-year readmission among psychiatric inpatients in Beijing China: a retrospective, medical record-based analysis.中国北京精神科住院患者 30 天和 1 年再入院的相关因素:一项回顾性基于病历的分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 11;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02515-1.
5
Validation of the Readmission Risk Score in Heart Failure Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.三级医院心力衰竭患者再入院风险评分的验证。
J Card Fail. 2015 Nov;21(11):885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Predictors and Causes of Early and Late Hospital Readmissions.炎症性肠病:早晚期住院再入院的预测因素和原因。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Oct;23(10):1832-1839. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001242.
7
Early primary care follow-up after ED and hospital discharge - does it affect readmissions?急诊就诊及出院后的早期初级保健随访——会影响再入院率吗?
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Apr;45(2):51-57. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1283935. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
8
Predicting frequent hospital admission risk in Singapore: a retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of comorbidities, acute illness burden and social determinants of health.预测新加坡频繁住院风险:一项回顾性队列研究,以调查合并症、急性疾病负担和健康的社会决定因素的影响。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012705.
9
Incidence and predictors of 30-day postoperative readmission in children.儿童术后30天再入院的发生率及预测因素
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jan;28(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/pan.13290. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
90-day Readmission in Elective Primary Lumbar Spine Surgery in the Inpatient Setting: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Sample Analysis.择期住院腰椎手术 90 天再入院:全国再入院数据库样本分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 15;44(14):E857-E864. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002995.

引用本文的文献

1
From one size fits all to a tailored approach: integrating precision medicine into medical education.从一刀切到量身定制的方法:将精准医学融入医学教育。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 18;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06138-y.
2
Risk Factor Analysis of Hospital Readmissions at St. Petersburg General Hospital.圣彼得堡总医院再入院的风险因素分析。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1415. eCollection 2023.
3
Predicting and Validating 30-day Hospital Readmission in Adults With Diabetes Whose Index Admission Is Diabetes-related.预测和验证索引入院与糖尿病相关的成年人糖尿病患者 30 天内的再入院情况。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Sep 28;107(10):2865-2873. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac380.
4
Published models that predict hospital readmission: a critical appraisal.发表的预测医院再入院模型:批判性评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 3;11(8):e044964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044964.
5
Common sampling and modeling approaches to analyzing readmission risk that ignore clustering produce misleading results.常见的分析再入院风险的抽样和建模方法忽略了聚类,会产生误导性的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01162-0.
6
Impact of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Limitations on Hospital Readmission: an Observational Study Using Machine Learning.日常生活工具性活动受限对医院再入院的影响:一项使用机器学习的观察性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2865-2872. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05982-0. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Association of Palliative Care Use and Setting With Health-care Utilization and Quality of Care at the End of Life Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.晚期肺癌患者姑息治疗的使用和设置与临终医疗保健利用和护理质量的关联。
Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2667-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Development of a predictive score for potentially avoidable hospital readmissions for general internal medicine patients.开发一种针对普通内科患者潜在可避免住院再入院的预测评分。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 15;14(7):e0219348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219348. eCollection 2019.
9
Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.利用电子病历数据库中的管理数据对高医疗利用群体进行特征描述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2.
10
POLAR Diversion: Using General Practice Data to Calculate Risk of Emergency Department Presentation at the Time of Consultation.极地转移:利用全科医疗数据在咨询时计算急诊科就诊风险。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):151-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678608. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a model for predicting emergency admissions over the next year (PEONY): a UK historical cohort study.预测未来一年急诊入院情况的模型(PEONY)的开发与验证:一项英国历史队列研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1416-22. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1416.
2
Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study.针对患有多种慢性病患者的远程家庭护理:试点研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Jan;54(1):58-65.
3
Improving the management of care for high-cost Medicaid patients.改善对高成本医疗补助患者的护理管理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1643-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1643.
4
Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management.初级保健与专科保健衔接处的共享护理在慢性病管理中的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub2.
5
Identifying patients at high risk of emergency hospital admissions: a logistic regression analysis.识别急诊入院高危患者:一项逻辑回归分析。
J R Soc Med. 2006 Aug;99(8):406-14. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900818.
6
Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients.发现有再次入院风险的患者:开发识别高危患者的算法
BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.657917.AE. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
7
High-cost users of hospital beds in Western Australia: a population-based record linkage study.西澳大利亚州医院病床的高成本使用者:一项基于人群的记录链接研究。
Med J Aust. 2006 Apr 17;184(8):393-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00289.x.
8
Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis.对老年充血性心力衰竭患者进行出院后支持的综合出院计划:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1358-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1358.
9
Discharge planning from hospital to home.从医院到家庭的出院计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD000313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000313.pub2.
10
A multidisciplinary Care Coordination Team improves emergency department discharge planning practice.一个多学科护理协调团队改善了急诊科出院计划的实施情况。
Med J Aust. 2002 Oct 21;177(8):435-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04884.x.