• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圣彼得堡总医院再入院的风险因素分析。

Risk Factor Analysis of Hospital Readmissions at St. Petersburg General Hospital.

作者信息

Wu Vincent, Quinonez Sean, Myers My, Borodunovich Kyle, Shamsi Aisha, Stocker Patrick, Fink Bryan, Ferreira Steven

机构信息

HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani College of Medicine GME Programs, St. Petersburg, FL.

HCA Florida St. Petersburg Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.

出版信息

HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1415. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.36518/2689-0216.1415
PMID:37426563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10327956/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decreased readmission rates are largely seen as an indicator of effective care and improved resource management. The case management team at St. Petersburg General Hospital in St. Petersburg, Florida identified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, pneumonia, and sepsis as 3 of the leading diagnoses on index admission that later led to 30-day readmissions. By examining patients with these 3 diagnoses on index admission, we decided to investigate potential readmission risk factors including patient age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), length of stay during the index admission, insurance type during index admission, discharge placement after index admission, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with data from 4180 patients at St. Petersburg General Hospital from 2016 through 2019 with index admission diagnoses of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, and sepsis. A univariate analysis was conducted on patient sex, race, BMI, length of stay during the index admission, health insurance type during the index admission, discharge placement after the index admission, presence of coronary artery disease, presence of heart failure, and presence of type 2 diabetes. Subsequently, a bivariate analysis was run on these variables in relation to 30-day readmissions. Then a multivariable analysis was completed using binary logistic regression and pairwise analysis to determine the significance between variables within the categories of discharge disposition and insurance type.

RESULTS

Of the 4180 patients included in this study, 926 (22.2%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. In the bivariate analysis race, BMI, mean length of stay during the index admission, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and type 2 diabetes were not significantly associated with readmission. The bivariate analysis revealed that patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities had the highest readmission rates (28%), followed by home care (26%) ( = .001). Medicaid patients (24%) and Medicare patients (23%) demonstrated higher read-mission rates than those with private insurance (17%) ( = .001). Readmitted patients were slightly younger (62.14 vs. 63.69 years; = .02) in the bivariate analysis. However, in the multi-variable analysis, only patients with type 2 diabetes and patients with non-private insurance were associated with increased readmission rates. Pairwise analysis of the variables within insurance and discharge disposition categories demonstrates decreased readmission for individuals with Private/Other when compared to other insurance subtypes and decreased readmission for Other when compared to discharge disposition subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that hospital readmissions are associated with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and having a non-private insurance status. Our findings lead us to suggest further investigation into changes in hospital policies and procedures for these groups that will aim to decrease readmission rates in the future.

摘要

背景

再入院率降低在很大程度上被视为有效护理和改善资源管理的一个指标。佛罗里达州圣彼得斯堡市圣彼得斯堡综合医院的病例管理团队确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重、肺炎和败血症是首次入院时的三大主要诊断,这些诊断后来导致了30天再入院情况。通过检查首次入院时患有这三种诊断的患者,我们决定调查潜在的再入院风险因素,包括患者年龄、性别、种族、体重指数(BMI)、首次入院期间的住院时间、首次入院期间的保险类型、首次入院后的出院安置、冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭和2型糖尿病。

方法

我们对圣彼得斯堡综合医院2016年至2019年的4180例患者的数据进行了回顾性研究,这些患者的首次入院诊断为COPD急性加重、肺炎和败血症。对患者的性别、种族、BMI、首次入院期间的住院时间、首次入院期间的医疗保险类型、首次入院后的出院安置、冠状动脉疾病的存在、心力衰竭的存在以及2型糖尿病的存在进行了单变量分析。随后,对这些变量与30天再入院情况进行了双变量分析。然后使用二元逻辑回归和成对分析完成多变量分析,以确定出院处置和保险类型类别内变量之间的显著性。

结果

本研究纳入的4180例患者中,926例(22.2%)在出院后30天内再次入院。在双变量分析中,种族、BMI、首次入院期间的平均住院时间、冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭和2型糖尿病与再入院无显著关联。双变量分析显示,出院到专业护理机构的患者再入院率最高(28%),其次是家庭护理(26%)(P = 0.001)。医疗补助患者(24%)和医疗保险患者(23%)的再入院率高于私人保险患者(17%)(P = 0.001)。在双变量分析中,再入院患者年龄稍小(62.14岁对63.69岁;P = 0.02)。然而,在多变量分析中,只有2型糖尿病患者和非私人保险患者的再入院率增加。对保险和出院处置类别内的变量进行成对分析表明,与其他保险亚型相比,拥有私人/其他保险的个体再入院率降低,与出院处置亚型相比,其他出院处置的个体再入院率降低。

结论

我们的数据表明,医院再入院与2型糖尿病诊断和非私人保险状态有关。我们的研究结果促使我们建议对这些群体的医院政策和程序变化进行进一步调查,旨在未来降低再入院率。

相似文献

1
Risk Factor Analysis of Hospital Readmissions at St. Petersburg General Hospital.圣彼得堡总医院再入院的风险因素分析。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1415. eCollection 2023.
2
Coronary artery bypass graft readmission rates and risk factors - A retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉旁路移植术再入院率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Trends in Readmission Rates, Hospital Charges, and Mortality for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Florida From 2009 to 2014.2009 年至 2014 年佛罗里达州慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者再入院率、住院费用和死亡率趋势。
Clin Ther. 2018 Apr;40(4):613-626.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
4
Frequency and diagnoses associated with 7- and 30-day readmission of skilled nursing facility patients to a nonteaching community hospital.熟练护理机构患者向非教学社区医院 7 天和 30 天再入院的频率和诊断。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Mar;12(3):195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
5
Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries.脓毒症后再入院模式的差异:一项针对退伍军人事务部受益人的队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):230-237. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-398OC.
6
Age-Related Differences in the Rate, Timing, and Diagnosis of 30-Day Readmissions in Hospitalized Adults With Asthma Exacerbation.哮喘急性加重住院成人30天再入院率、时间及诊断方面的年龄差异
Chest. 2016 Apr;149(4):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.039. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Incidence, Predictors, Causes, and Cost of 30-Day Hospital Readmission in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy.接受支气管镜检查的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者30天再入院的发生率、预测因素、原因及费用
Cureus. 2020 Jun 13;12(6):e8607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8607.
8
Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia.心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎患者住院后 30 天内再入院的诊断和时间。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 23;309(4):355-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.216476.
9
Frequency of hospital readmission and care fragmentation in gastroparesis: A nationwide analysis.胃轻瘫患者再次入院频率及医疗碎片化情况:一项全国性分析。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):200-209. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.200.
10
Factors Associated with Differential Readmission Diagnoses Following Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后不同再入院诊断的相关因素
J Hosp Med. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):219-227. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3367. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Veteran hospitalizations and associated readmissions and emergency department visits during the MISSION Act era.军人医院住院治疗及相关再入院和急诊就诊趋势在 MISSION 法案时代。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14332. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14332. Epub 2024 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of a Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Outpatient Diabetes Program on Hospital Readmission Rates in Patients with Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study.综合多学科门诊糖尿病项目对糖尿病患者住院再入院率的影响:一项随机对照前瞻性研究。
Endocr Pract. 2020 Nov;26(11):1331-1336. doi: 10.4158/EP-2020-0261.
2
Patient Readmission Rates For All Insurance Types After Implementation Of The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.患者在医院再入院率降低计划实施后的所有保险类型的再入院率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Apr;38(4):585-593. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05412.
3
Impact of pharmacotherapeutic education on medication adherence and adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized study.药物治疗教育对2型糖尿病患者药物依从性和不良结局的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Croat Med J. 2018 Dec 31;59(6):290-297. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2018.59.290.
4
Readmissions Among Sepsis Survivors: Risk Factors and Prevention.脓毒症幸存者的再入院情况:危险因素与预防
Clin Pulm Med. 2018 May;25(3):79-83. doi: 10.1097/CPM.0000000000000254.
5
Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rates for Medicare and Non-Medicare Patients in the Era of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案时代 Medicare 和非 Medicare 患者 30 天再入院率的趋势。
Am J Med. 2018 Nov;131(11):1324-1331.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
Trends in 30-day readmission rates after COPD hospitalization, 2006-2012.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)住院后 30 天再入院率的趋势,2006-2012 年。
Respir Med. 2017 Sep;130:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.058. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
Readmission After COPD Exacerbation Scale: determining 30-day readmission risk for COPD patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后再入院量表:确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者30天再入院风险
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jun 29;12:1891-1902. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S136768. eCollection 2017.
8
Impact of a COPD comprehensive case management program on hospital length of stay and readmission rates.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)综合病例管理项目对住院时间和再入院率的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 21;12:961-971. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S124385. eCollection 2017.
9
Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries.脓毒症后再入院模式的差异:一项针对退伍军人事务部受益人的队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):230-237. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-398OC.
10
Association of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders with Unplanned Readmissions among Patients Hospitalized for Pneumonia.早期不复苏医嘱与肺炎住院患者计划性再入院的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jan;14(1):103-109. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-617OC.